Santa Cruz Good Times

Tuesday
Apr 28th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Town Hall with Supervisor Greg Caput

Greg KaputWhere do you stand on Watsonville’s possible Sakata-Kett Annexation?

This coming June 4, Watsonville voters will vote on whether or not the City of Watsonville should annex the Sakata-Kett property, which is just to the west of city limits beyond our cold storage and industrial sectors. The annexation vote will also include a patch of land west of Highway 1 that includes the historic Redman-Hirahara House. I am unequivocally opposed to this project because I think that it has been thoroughly rushed and has not provided the planning details necessary to merit voter support.

Back in the mid-90s, the Sakata-Kett property was considered as potentially being part of the City of Watsonville’s 2030 plan intended to outline the future expansion of the city. But residents specifically voiced their opposition to the annexation of Sakata-Kett being coupled alongside the other proposed annexation areas of Buena Vista, Atkinson and Manabe-Ow (what would eventually comprise Measure U). To date, little to no progress has been made on developing any of these areas. Moreover, multiple abandoned lots abound in town and have sat idle for years. The sad fact of the matter is that, over the past 30 years, our city has made a consistent and steady decline that no rushed annexation plan will reverse.

Whereas I admire the initiative some have taken to spur forward the struggling economy, I believe that proposals for annexation are currently ill advised and lacking. I agree that (theoretically) the property would suit development as it is adjacent to the city limits and enclosed within the freeway, providing access to potential customers. Yet the fact that we do not have identified business partners, or anything beyond a colorless box-store strategy, deeply troubles me.

We need to make sure that we have a plan based off of more than wishful thinking and hunches. To even consider moving forward, we need detailed outlining of investments and investment strategies. Just because you lay down a patch of concrete and call it Disneyland, does not mean that Mickey Mouse will be showing up.

Proponents will say that nobody else is coming up with ideas to spur our local economy. Yet many of us have: “Concentrate on our Downtown!” works on filling empty lots. Stop spending on structural overtime. Stop dreaming that union-smashers and small business destroyers like Wal-Mart are going to solve all our problems. The City of Watsonville needs to prove that they could develop abandoned buildings and empty lots before we ever trust them to build over prime agricultural land.

The City of Watsonville has struggled mightily to revitalize our downtown and has misdirected funds into projects such as the new Watsonville Civic Center and the defense of lawsuits for projects eerily similar to the proposed Sakata-Kett annexation. City leaders have proved highly efficient in mismanaging the problems that are already in front of them. Generally speaking, before you trust anybody, you have to look at past accomplishments and track records. The city’s recent track record of failure after failure does not cultivate much confidence, only hopeless concrete. This June 4, I will not be supporting Measure T, which by measure only stands for more of the same: Trouble.

Comments (5)Add Comment
Great article
written by Shauna Lopez, April 24, 2013
Had heard what a great article this was, glad to finsally read it. Thanks for all your work Mr. Caput
Divided
written by Cathy H, April 19, 2013
I can't really speak for what Caput has done for watsonville but will say that the high unemployment is because of horrible mismanagement of the city. Our downtown is lousy! Just lousy! Dodge and Felpe Hernandez and those guys talk with a lot of enthusiasm and pump up Measure T but at the end of the day they're just puppets or stand ins, it's city mamgement that gets the F-. I don't trust them at all. I have no problem with paving over this land, mama be ow too, but not with tPalacio and these guys in charge of it. A "business center" Mike Sanchez? Wal Mart is not a business center.
Yes we do deserve better
written by Mike Sanchez , April 15, 2013
This is something that Greg Caput apparently seems to misunderstand. While he was a Watsonville Council member, Caput failed to help direct Watsonville in a positive and flourishing direction. The land in question supports seasonal and part time farm labor employment, as compared to a possible all year round "business center" providing full time employment opportunities. Before the city can invest public money, Watsonville needs Measure T to pass to amend the urban limit line. No one else is coming up with any ideas to generate new revenue.
Watsonville Does Deserve Better
written by Mike Sanchez , April 15, 2013

The City is currently experiencing 22% unemployment, Budget struggles and high volume of youth graduating high school every year with no jobs to look forward to. Watsonville is experiencing Low revenue intake. There are many services that depend on the City budget like public safety, Police, Fire and library services. It takes money and revenue to run a city.
Watsonvile deserves better
written by Esteban Rivas, April 11, 2013
I'm on point with this article. I think that Watsonville deserves better than WAlmart or Cosco. I've wored in the fields and am not going to say i loved it or think that farmers are doing anything great for mexicanos but if were going to build on that land it needs to be some kind of real job producer no slavery for slavery

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

We Can Rebuild You

A look back at how downtown Santa Cruz recovered from the 1989 earthquake

 

International Earth Day—Mother Earth Day

Every April 22, humanity celebrates International Mother Earth Day and Earth Day. As more than a billion people participate in Earth Day activities every year, Earth Day has become the world’s largest civic observance. The massive concern to build right relations between humanity and the living being we call Earth is evidence of humanity’s love of the Mother. In 2009, the United Nations General Assembly proclaimed April 22 International Mother Earth Day, with a significant resolution affirming “the interdependence existing among human beings, other living species (the kingdoms—mineral, plant, animal and human) and the planet itself, the Earth which we all inhabit.” The Earth is our home. Celebrating Earth Day helps us define new emerging processes (economic, social, political) focused on the well-being of the kingdoms. Through these, humanity seeks to raise the quality of life, foster equality and begin to establish right relations with the Earth. We dedicate ourselves to bringing forth balance and a relationship of harmony with all of nature. Learn about planting a billion trees (the Canopy Project); participate in 1.5 billion acts of green. Disassociation (toward Earth) is no longer viable. We lose our connection to life itself. Participation is viable—an anchor, refuge and service for all of life on Earth. Visit earthday.org; harmonywithnatureun.org; and un.org/en/events/motherearthday for more information. From Farmers Almanac, “On Earth Day, enjoy the tonic of fresh air, contact with the soil, companionship with nature! Go barefooted. Walk through woods, find wildflowers and green moss. Remain outside, no matter the weather!” Nature, Earth’s most balanced kingdom, heals us. The New Group of World Servers is preparing for the May 3 Wesak Buddha Taurus solar festival. We prepare through asking for and offering forgiveness. Forgiveness purifies and like nature, heals.

 

The New Tech Nexus

Community leaders in science and technology unite to form web-based networking program

 

Dark Magic

40 years on the movie beat in Santa Cruz
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Oral Fixations

Blown away by a Tuesday night dinner at Oswald

 

If you could live in Santa Cruz in any era besides now, which would you choose?

Probably the ’70s, because Santa Cruz is such a fly-your-freak-flag place. That was when free love and hippiness was in vogue. Shane Reber, Santa Cruz, Caretaker

 

Sarah’s Vineyard

Sarah’s Vineyard of Gilroy is known for crafting fine wines—and one of my all-time favorites is its Chardonnay. But this time, its Viognier has my vote.

 

Munch

East Coast meets West Coast in new meat lover’s paradise