Santa Cruz Good Times

Tuesday
Feb 09th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Cleaning the Slate

altSANTA CRUZ >  OSC discussions in the aftermath of River Street occupation

On Saturday night, Dec. 3, protestors left the building they had inhabited at 75 River St. after confirming with the Santa Cruz Police Department earlier that afternoon that they would leave after cleaning up. Police reported that when they arrived at 9:30 p.m., nobody was inside, but that there was substantial damage to the interior of the building.

The offshoot group that held the building since Wednesday, Nov. 30 spoke with the rest of Occupy Santa Cruz on both Saturday and Sunday about various issues, including the divide between the OSC General Assembly and the building occupiers over the actions taken that Wednesday night. OSC members who were opposed to the actions taken by their fellow protestors were mostly concerned about the safety of people inside the building and back at the courthouse, as well as losing support from the city due to the actions of the building occupiers.

The OSC press release about the 75 River Street occupation states: “While the Occupy Santa Cruz General Assembly does not support the uncensored and autonomous action of reclaiming 75 River Street, OSC does support the need for community space. Individuals are encouraged to participate in any and all direct actions their conscience compels them to support. Because some OSC individuals do support the reclaiming of 75 River Street, OSC invites the entire community including 75 River, business owners, city officials and unions to discuss the issue of reclaiming public and unused spaces at OSC’s General Assembly at the Courthouse at 2:30 p.m. for the next four weeks.”

During the smaller meeting on Saturday, Dec. 3 and the larger public one on Sunday, Dec. 4 OSC members cited rumors about people involved in the River Street occupation who wanted to set fire to the building, as well as people who intentionally broke glass and sprayed graffiti. At this point, these rumors have not been proven as truth. What was certain is that OSC members who were against the River Street occupation were upset with their fellow protestors over putting people in harm’s way.

“There were a number of reasons why we decided to leave on Saturday, but the straw that broke the camel’s back was when the rest of OSC pled with us on Saturday morning to make sure nobody got hurt,” one man who declined to give his name told GT. “SCPD had been in contact with us via a cell phone, and they made sure to remind us that they were not opposed to using force to get us out of the building.”

He went on to say that he felt that what he and the other building occupiers did was “epic,” and that their actions have inspired other Occupy movements, specifically in Seattle where people recently took over an abandoned warehouse.

The main point that all people present at the meetings emphasized was the importance of maintaining the solidarity and integrity of OSC. Occupiers acknowledged that this weekend brought a physical setback to their movement, but not a necessarily a moral one.

The physical setback being referred to not only involves the loss of the building on River Street. On Sunday morning, Dec. 4, county sheriffs removed the Geodesic Dome (dubbed the “Interplanetary Occudome”) that had become an OSC landmark where it sat in front of the courthouse steps, as well as a number of tents that were on the front lawn. They placed a temporary fence around the front area of the courthouse. At the time of this writing, the encampment in San Lorenzo Park still remains intact.

One OSC member explained to the rest of the group during Sunday’s meeting that he felt that the county had wanted to remove the dome ever since their movement started and that their actions on Sunday were unrelated to the River Street occupation. He felt that OSC had been “misled into the guise that the county was going to tolerate [them].” On that subject, another OSC member stated that they had been told by the sheriffs that they would get their confiscated property back later in the week.

By the end of the meeting on Sunday, all of OSC agreed that the occupation of the building on River Street seriously addressed a need for community space. “More students came down to check out the River Street occupation this week and it’s because different types of actions attract different types of people,” said one attendee. “A diversity of tactics is a good thing, and this week gained the Occupy movement a lot of attention.”

The meeting also touched on ideas for future actions, including addressing foreclosures. “We have the hearts and the guts to defend people with foreclosed homes,” another attendee said. “And if you think that what we did was not successful, then this very conversation we’re having right now with more people than ever before proves you wrong.”

Comments (2)Add Comment
...
written by Josh Reilly, December 06, 2011
The County thinks OSC is responsible directly or indirectly for about $40K in damage and Sheriff OT. The County wanted OSC gone the first night. The County thinks the OSC camp is just a place where drug-addicted mentally ill homeless criminals can stay and misbehave under the banner of Occupy but not really in the spirit. The County thinks the organizers are spoiled middle class, naive twits being manipulated by streetwise sociopaths and the rest are just burned out hippies. There was a drawn out argument between the City and County about who would respond and how, but the bank occupation more or less settled it. The SLR camp is going to be cleared Weds according to the SCSO. About time. I would suggest packing up and moving out first, just like with the bank. This movement needs to be light, flexible, fleet of foot, mobile and not anchored to any kind of terrain: not land, not cyberspace, not city council meetings, etc. This movement needs to have a hold where it cannot easily be cleared. In people's thoughts. This movement may want a better deal for the homeless but that will not be achieved by camping by the river, serving them meals and tolerating their self-destructive, reflexively anti-social behavior. The Occupy camps should, like the Hoovervilles before them, be called "Obamavilles" or "Goldman-Sachsvilles" maybe. But the focus has to stay on the core issue or it will be diluted into unrecognizability. OSC has already crossed that threshold. You (we?) are going to have to re-occupy "Occupy".
...
written by Marjorie, December 06, 2011
Most real change in history comes from the citizens being fed up with the current situation which they find unjust and intolerable in a country founded on justice, equality and democracy. Civil disobedience is part of the way change comes about, historically, and has ultimately been far more effective than the violence often used to suppress change. The civil rights movement is such an obvious example of this. Let's keep the historical perspective in mind, each operating in good conscience in what s/he does, with the ultimate cause clearly in mind. To me what is most amazing is the democratic nature of the current OWS movement, which I find most encouraging. We "oldsters" who had nearly given up hope for the "younger generation," have gotten our hope back again. I have the greatest admiration for what is happening across this nation, and I have confidence that ultimately it will be extremely effective, but this could take years, not days or months to accomplish, as with other movements of the past. When we can chose leaders of this beautiful country who are not corrupt or corruptible, who seek to care for the whole citizenry of our country, not just the wealthy few, we will stand a chance of seeing real, lasting change coming to our land, and once more be proud to call us Americans. "For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's futures. And we are all mortal."- John F. Kennedy

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

On the Run

Is there hope for California’s salmon?

 

Chinese New Year of the Red Fire Monkey

Monday, Feb. 8, is Aquarius new moon (19 degrees) and Chinese New Year of the Red Fire Monkey (an imaginative, intelligent and vigilant creature). Monkey is bright, quick, lively, quite naughty, clever, inquiring, sensible, and reliable. Monkey loves to help others. Often they are teachers, writers and linguists. They are very talented, like renaissance people. Leonardo Da Vinci was born in the year of Monkey. Monkey contains metal (relation to gold) and water (wisdom, danger). 2016 will be a year of finances. For a return on one’s money, invest in monkey’s ideas. Metal is related to wind (change). Therefore events in 2016 will change very quickly. We must ponder with care before making financial, business and relationship changes. Fortune’s path may not be smooth in 2016. Finances and business as usual will be challenged. Although we develop practical goals, the outcomes are different than hoped for. We must be cautious with investments and business partnership. It is most important to cultivate a balanced and harmonious daily life, seeking ways to release tension, pressure and stress to improve health and calmness. Monkey is lively, flexible, quick-witted, and versatile. Their gentle, honest, enchanting yet resourceful nature results often in everlasting love. Monkeys are freedom loving. Without freedom, Monkey becomes dull, sad and very unhappy. During the Spring and Autumn Period (770 - 476 BC), the Chinese official title of Marquis (noble person) was pronounced ‘Hou,’ the same as the pronunciation of ‘monkey’ in Chinese. Monkey was thereby bestowed with auspicious (favorable, fortunate) meaning. Monkey years are: 1920, 1932, 1944, 1956, 1968, 1980, 1992, 2004, 2016.  

 

The New Tech Nexus

Community leaders in science and technology unite to form web-based networking program

 

Film, Times & Events: Week of February 5

Santa Cruz area movie theaters >
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Wine and Chocolate

West Cliff Wines gets its game on, plus a brand new chocolate cafe on Center Street

 

How would you stop people from littering?

Teach them from the time that they’re small that it’s not an appropriate behavior. Juliet Jones, Santa Cruz, Claims Adjuster

 

Dancing Creek Winery

New Zinfandel Port is a ruby beauty

 

Venus Spirits

Changing law could mean new opportunity for local spirits