Santa Cruz Good Times

Thursday
Apr 24th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Cleaning the Slate

altSANTA CRUZ >  OSC discussions in the aftermath of River Street occupation

On Saturday night, Dec. 3, protestors left the building they had inhabited at 75 River St. after confirming with the Santa Cruz Police Department earlier that afternoon that they would leave after cleaning up. Police reported that when they arrived at 9:30 p.m., nobody was inside, but that there was substantial damage to the interior of the building.

The offshoot group that held the building since Wednesday, Nov. 30 spoke with the rest of Occupy Santa Cruz on both Saturday and Sunday about various issues, including the divide between the OSC General Assembly and the building occupiers over the actions taken that Wednesday night. OSC members who were opposed to the actions taken by their fellow protestors were mostly concerned about the safety of people inside the building and back at the courthouse, as well as losing support from the city due to the actions of the building occupiers.

The OSC press release about the 75 River Street occupation states: “While the Occupy Santa Cruz General Assembly does not support the uncensored and autonomous action of reclaiming 75 River Street, OSC does support the need for community space. Individuals are encouraged to participate in any and all direct actions their conscience compels them to support. Because some OSC individuals do support the reclaiming of 75 River Street, OSC invites the entire community including 75 River, business owners, city officials and unions to discuss the issue of reclaiming public and unused spaces at OSC’s General Assembly at the Courthouse at 2:30 p.m. for the next four weeks.”

During the smaller meeting on Saturday, Dec. 3 and the larger public one on Sunday, Dec. 4 OSC members cited rumors about people involved in the River Street occupation who wanted to set fire to the building, as well as people who intentionally broke glass and sprayed graffiti. At this point, these rumors have not been proven as truth. What was certain is that OSC members who were against the River Street occupation were upset with their fellow protestors over putting people in harm’s way.

“There were a number of reasons why we decided to leave on Saturday, but the straw that broke the camel’s back was when the rest of OSC pled with us on Saturday morning to make sure nobody got hurt,” one man who declined to give his name told GT. “SCPD had been in contact with us via a cell phone, and they made sure to remind us that they were not opposed to using force to get us out of the building.”

He went on to say that he felt that what he and the other building occupiers did was “epic,” and that their actions have inspired other Occupy movements, specifically in Seattle where people recently took over an abandoned warehouse.

The main point that all people present at the meetings emphasized was the importance of maintaining the solidarity and integrity of OSC. Occupiers acknowledged that this weekend brought a physical setback to their movement, but not a necessarily a moral one.

The physical setback being referred to not only involves the loss of the building on River Street. On Sunday morning, Dec. 4, county sheriffs removed the Geodesic Dome (dubbed the “Interplanetary Occudome”) that had become an OSC landmark where it sat in front of the courthouse steps, as well as a number of tents that were on the front lawn. They placed a temporary fence around the front area of the courthouse. At the time of this writing, the encampment in San Lorenzo Park still remains intact.

One OSC member explained to the rest of the group during Sunday’s meeting that he felt that the county had wanted to remove the dome ever since their movement started and that their actions on Sunday were unrelated to the River Street occupation. He felt that OSC had been “misled into the guise that the county was going to tolerate [them].” On that subject, another OSC member stated that they had been told by the sheriffs that they would get their confiscated property back later in the week.

By the end of the meeting on Sunday, all of OSC agreed that the occupation of the building on River Street seriously addressed a need for community space. “More students came down to check out the River Street occupation this week and it’s because different types of actions attract different types of people,” said one attendee. “A diversity of tactics is a good thing, and this week gained the Occupy movement a lot of attention.”

The meeting also touched on ideas for future actions, including addressing foreclosures. “We have the hearts and the guts to defend people with foreclosed homes,” another attendee said. “And if you think that what we did was not successful, then this very conversation we’re having right now with more people than ever before proves you wrong.”

Comments (2)Add Comment
...
written by Josh Reilly, December 06, 2011
The County thinks OSC is responsible directly or indirectly for about $40K in damage and Sheriff OT. The County wanted OSC gone the first night. The County thinks the OSC camp is just a place where drug-addicted mentally ill homeless criminals can stay and misbehave under the banner of Occupy but not really in the spirit. The County thinks the organizers are spoiled middle class, naive twits being manipulated by streetwise sociopaths and the rest are just burned out hippies. There was a drawn out argument between the City and County about who would respond and how, but the bank occupation more or less settled it. The SLR camp is going to be cleared Weds according to the SCSO. About time. I would suggest packing up and moving out first, just like with the bank. This movement needs to be light, flexible, fleet of foot, mobile and not anchored to any kind of terrain: not land, not cyberspace, not city council meetings, etc. This movement needs to have a hold where it cannot easily be cleared. In people's thoughts. This movement may want a better deal for the homeless but that will not be achieved by camping by the river, serving them meals and tolerating their self-destructive, reflexively anti-social behavior. The Occupy camps should, like the Hoovervilles before them, be called "Obamavilles" or "Goldman-Sachsvilles" maybe. But the focus has to stay on the core issue or it will be diluted into unrecognizability. OSC has already crossed that threshold. You (we?) are going to have to re-occupy "Occupy".
...
written by Marjorie, December 06, 2011
Most real change in history comes from the citizens being fed up with the current situation which they find unjust and intolerable in a country founded on justice, equality and democracy. Civil disobedience is part of the way change comes about, historically, and has ultimately been far more effective than the violence often used to suppress change. The civil rights movement is such an obvious example of this. Let's keep the historical perspective in mind, each operating in good conscience in what s/he does, with the ultimate cause clearly in mind. To me what is most amazing is the democratic nature of the current OWS movement, which I find most encouraging. We "oldsters" who had nearly given up hope for the "younger generation," have gotten our hope back again. I have the greatest admiration for what is happening across this nation, and I have confidence that ultimately it will be extremely effective, but this could take years, not days or months to accomplish, as with other movements of the past. When we can chose leaders of this beautiful country who are not corrupt or corruptible, who seek to care for the whole citizenry of our country, not just the wealthy few, we will stand a chance of seeing real, lasting change coming to our land, and once more be proud to call us Americans. "For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's futures. And we are all mortal."- John F. Kennedy

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

Best of Santa Cruz County 2014

The 2014 Santa Cruz County Readers' Poll Come on in, and have a look around. There’s a lot to see—hundreds of winners selected by thousands of GT readers across Santa Cruz County. So if some of this looks familiar, it’s probably because you helped make it happen. But there are always new things to discover, too—you could go to a different winner or runner-up every day in the Food and Drink category alone, and you’d be booked just about until next year’s Best of Santa Cruz County issue comes out.

 

Something Essential Disappears

Lunar and solar eclipses follow one another. Lunar eclipses occur at full moons, and solar eclipses at new moons. Two weeks ago at the full moon we had the blood red moon—a total lunar eclipse (the next one is Oct. 8). On Monday night, April 28 (new moon), as the Sun, Moon and Earth align, a solar eclipse (Sun obscured) occurs. Eclipses signify something irrevocably is changed in our world. The Sun is our essential life force. Monday’s new moon, 9 degrees Taurus, is also an annular solar eclipse when the Moon moves centrally in front of the Sun, yet does not cover the Sun completely. The Sun's outer edges, still visible, form a “ring of fire” around the Moon.

 

Sugar: The New Tobacco?

Proposed bill would require warning labels on sugary drinks Will soda and other saccharine libations soon come with a health warning? They will if it’s up to our state senator, Bill Monning (D-Carmel). On Feb. 27, Monning proposed first-of-its-kind legislation that would require a consumer warning label be placed on sugar-sweetened beverages sold in California. SB 1000, also known as the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Safety Warning Act, was proposed to provide vital information to consumers about the harmful effects of consuming sugary drinks, such as sodas, sports drinks, energy drinks, and sweetened teas.

 

Film, Times & Events: Week of April 17

Santa Cruz area movie theaters >
Sign up for Tomorrow's Good Times Today
Upcoming arts & events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Palate-Stretching 101

A wine education with Soif’s experts As a veteran of many weekend wine “seminars” at Soif, I have to confess that I’ve never known less (going in) and learned more (coming out) than I did last week at the Spanish Wine Tasting with ace rep Brian Greenwood. These are classy, casual events and it’s hard to imagine having this much flavor fun anywhere for $20.

 

Martin Ranch Winery

Sauvignon Blanc 2011 One of my favorite wines is Sauvignon Blanc, and this one made by Martin Ranch is particularly lovely. Bright, crisp and refreshing, it’s perfect to pair with fish and shellfish—and good for picnics as it has an easy screw-cap bottle. There’s nothing worse than setting down your blanket, pulling out your sandwiches—and then realizing you don’t have a corkscrew.

 

Foodie File: Red Apple Cafe

Breakfast takes center stage at Gracia Krakauer's Red Apple Cafe Before they moved to Aptos, Gracia and her husband Dan Krakauer would visit friends in Santa Cruz County and eat at the Red Apple Café all the time. Then they moved up here from Santa Monica five years ago, and bought the Aptos location (there’s a separate one in Watsonville) from the family who owned it for two decades.

 

How would you feel about a tech industry boom in Santa Cruz?

I feel like it would ruin the small old-town feeling of Santa Cruz. It wouldn’t be the same Surf City kind of vacation town that it is. Antoinette BennettSanta Cruz | Construction Management