Santa Cruz Good Times

Friday
Aug 01st
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

From the Editor

greg_archerS2sPlus Letters to Good Times...
Sour Notes
About That Meat ...
A therapist—yes, it was mine—recently asked me: “When you think of “the best” things about Santa Cruz, what comes to mind?” I laughed. Well, the answer was simple: My therapist. The last one I had always fell asleep on me. This guy—not so much. So, life has improved. But seriously … I sat there for a moment and, in a deliciously vulnerable state of being, responded with this: “People can be who they want to be here … but what makes it best for me is that I have the freedom to be myself and create whatever the hell I want.” The depth of that openhearted, genuine admission moved us both to tears. (Actually, I may be projecting that last part onto my therapist, but you get the picture.) Needless to say, there was “movement.” But there always seems to be, creative or otherwise, in this great place we call Santa Cruz County.

All that to say … Welcome to this year’s publication of the Best of Santa Cruz County Readers Poll, a massive tome—our biggest yet—spotlighting all of the locals you voted “Best.” This year’s voting attracted more than 4,000 voters online and features more than 150 little-known facts about the winners. The journey begins on hereGT writers reveal their Best and Worst picks.

This issue stands out for another reason. It also commemorates GT’s 35th Anniversary. That’s right, folks, we’re approaching middle-age.

But now that 35 is the new 25, and with all the modern technological advances in media, we’re committed as ever to a mission of inspiring and offering readers the best bundle of information weekly—here on these pages and at goodtimessantacruz.com.

Truthfully, it’s you, the readers, that comprise the best Santa Cruz County has to offer. Without you, we would not have existed for 35 years. So thanks for being the “best.” Enjoy the issue ...
Greg Archer | Editor-in-Chief


Letters to Good Times Editor
Sour Notes
Regarding last week’s news story on street musicians, Robert Norse lives in his own echo chamber, wherein the relevant issue of the day is always ... Robert Norse. It's funny, because on his floundering radio show he comes across as engaging, intelligent and quite witty. And, of course, endlessly self-referential. But the fun stops there. If you don't agree with his "criminalization of the poor" world view he'll steamroll over your arguments while castigating the police for their heavy-handed treatment of the downtrodden, which is hogwash, of course. But Norse, having already driven this vehicle into a ditch, refuses to let up on the accelerator.
And one does detect a bit of hypocrisy in Norse and company's latest go-round in the courts. After all, it was Mr. Norse who formulated his oft-repeated mantra concerning the sleeping ban. The homeless, he is fond of saying, should be afforded a place to sleep “not anywhere and everywhere, but somewhere.” I actually agree with this well-reasoned sentiment. The sleeping ban, in which the homeless are forbidden to sleep while the rest of us are snug in our beds, is straight out of “Alice In Wonderland.” And yet, wasn't the day-sleeper on Pacific Avenue who complained about Norse’s boisterous singing also engaged in trying to (unsuccessfully) sleep “not anywhere or everywhere, but somewhere?”
Look, give Mr. Norse credit for doggedly putting himself out there among some of the more unsavory characters who grace this town. Most of us choose to do otherwise. Problem is, he takes every tale from the street at face value and stockpiles these often fabricated and embellished stories to use as ammunition against an already understaffed police department. But methinks he's shooting blanks. Methinks he should go on a police ride-along to see what the cops are really up against. Mr. Norse, I'm afraid your fifteen minutes are up. Way up.
Tim Rudolph
Santa Cruz

About That Meat ...
On the topic of meat, the environment, and all that jazz (GT 4/15), it seems that arguments on issues such as these are what usually strike up the battle of “green vs. green.” The question, that some of us may very well be asking ourselves right now, is, “where in my life do I want to cut back?” More to the point, “where in my life can I afford to cut back?”
I know that a lot of us right now are on a fixed income and as good as it may sound to go out and plant a bunch of trees, or eat locally 100 percent of the time, it can be hard on the budget. There is also the matter of “am I really helping? “Is this biodegradable chip bag really saving the environment?” This is really a matter of where in your life do you want to conserve? You could put your lunch in a reusable container instead of a bag. But most reusable containers are made of plastic, which is bad for the environment. Another dilemma is that usually when these containers break, we end up throwing them out … so much for that idea. Well, you say to yourself, “I could trade in my Hummer for a hybrid ...”
“Maybe I could eat less meat,” you say to yourself. Cows eat grass, then deposit manure which we use to fertilize our gardens, to keep our plants healthy, happy and tasting good. Meat isn’t bad if you know where to get it. My family eats and sells local foods from Panoche Valley and Santa Cruz County which means that the meat we eat doesn’t come from more than 100 miles away. I have been to the farms where my meat comes from and have seen how well the people there take care of the animals and the land they are grazed on. It is nice to know that the animals are always killed in the most humane ways. I know it sounds pretty brutal but the reality is that when you’re eating meat you are in fact eating a dead animal. I think it is important to know how the animal was killed to ensure that there was no suffering.
Another thing is, if you become a vegetarian or even a vegan, to get more variety, you will start buying products from out of the state or even the country. In the end, if you were to simply shop local, you would be doing the environment a much bigger favor, and at the same time, would be helping to create a healthier planet.
Danielle Kissinger
Ocean Grove Charter School,
9th Grade
Comments (3)Add Comment
natural scientist
written by billy quealy, May 09, 2010
Unssustainable Meat Economy

Obvious Mz Danielle Kissinger –(GT April 2010),a 9th grader of above average intel,
in time will concur research shows a “grass fed” happy cow model has never been sustainable.

We made a cultural institution from what was originally a diet of desperation.
It requires a steady source of forests (almost gone)to clear for animal feed crops and grazing land.
( “Losing Ground” Erik Eckholm 1976?)

The area known as the garden of eden, (‘protection in balance’),
spread out from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers into the middle east.
Recorded and later proven by carbon dating as a lush vegetative region.
(“Topsoil & Civilization” )

Hunting and gathering led to domesticating goats to this day preventing return of
multicanopy vegetation. Subsequent weather washed away remaining
topsoils’ability to retain moisture, -growing deserts.
(see”Desertification” UNEProgramme, 1977) Haiti, took out
the trees, let goats go loosen the rock, and with rain buried a town in mud.
This occurred so often in the middle east and europe the devil was given goat horns..
-humans would not bear any responsibility

In the US, leasing public lands to ranchers has caused over 50% of these lands to be overgrazed.
(”Forest Killers” Jack Sheppard, Sierra Club Books, 1975)

Some may balance their urgent programmable want of an animal diet, with grown
backyards, and means of diverting manure from well water sources.
But all too often becomes the most destructive to life practice by humans worldwide.
Industrialization of a diet fit to make grain traders or ranchers
wealthy, and a loaf of bread $4.00, is also cause for the majority of species extinction,
poisoning all competition, the biggest waste and polluter of US water, and worldwide food shortage..
(runoff of feedlot, fertilizer and chems sprayed on feed.1979 USDA AgRS Beltsville,Md.)

Even organic farms are contaminated by e-coli from adjacent grazing lands,
(CNN Salinas Valley’s ‘07 Spinach deaths). Because they couldn’t prove w/ ranchers’ cow the
mutant bacteria came from the organic farm’s insurance had to pay damages.
( “Grain Merchants” book 1980s?) ( “Diet for a New America” Robbins) was written by the
guy whose article Danielle was responding to; also an excellent resource.

billy quealy
po box 7059
santa cruz ca 95060








For those interested in the details of the Sinister Sidewalk Singing Citations...
written by Robert Norse, May 02, 2010
Sinister Street Singers Trials Consolidated and Postponed Until July" http://www.indybay.org/newsite...646105.php
We need the right to sleep AND the right to sing.
written by Robert Norse, April 30, 2010
Thanks, Tim, for acknowledging the obvious, that “the sleeping ban, in which the homeless are forbidden to sleep while the rest of us are snug in our beds, is straight out of 'Alice in Wonderland'”. Randolf gets what the Santa Cruz City Council, the SCPD, the Santa Cruz Sentinel, the Downtown Association, the City Attorney, Mayor Mike Rotkin, and Vice-Mayor Ryan Coonerty don't.

Frightening and fining homeless people for sleeping at night when there's no legal shelter ashames and outrages many of us. However it's another matter to say residents who don't want to invest in earplugs have the right to shut down protest on Pacific Avenue during the day.

This happened in the latest “Disturb a Daysleeper with Song, Pay $250” in the Becky Johnson “Sinister Sidewalk Singsong Citation” case. Police should be acting as advisers and mediators, not goon squads with a political agenda. The City Attorney needs to dump the “hassle the homeless” agenda or be retired—along with the outgoing City Manager.

Going after singers and drummers is part of a conservative agena to drive away street culture and visible poverty using penguin statues, panhandler “Imagine Real Change” meters, forbidden-to-sit zones, “no go” parking lot laws and stepped up police patrols. We must.stop the police from misusing city ordinances to muzzle and move along musicians and activists from 8 AM to 10 PM. And let homeless people sleep at night while we're at it.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

Picture of Health

Santa Cruz just received a high ranking among California counties. But it may be hiding some of the biggest health dangers facing our area

 

In The Time of Leo: Our Creative Efforts

 

Final Cut

Cedar Street Video to close after 10 years at downtown location

 

Time Capsule

Actors age in real time in audacious, mesmerizing ‘Boyhood’
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Foodie File: Maharaja

Chef Didar Singh on Royal Taj’s reincarnation as Maharaja

 

I remember Santa Cruz when…

Santa Cruz | Librarian

 

Best of Santa Cruz County

The 2013 Santa Cruz County Readers' Poll and Critics’ Picks It’s our biggest issue of the year, and in it, your votes—more than 6,500 of them—determined the winners of The Best of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll. New to the long list of local restaurants, shops and other notables that captured your interest: Best Beer Selection, Best Locally Owned Business, Best Customer Service and Best Marijuana Dispensary. In the meantime, many readers were ever so chatty online about potential new categories. Some of the suggestions that stood out: Best Teen Program and Best Web Design/Designer. But what about: Dog Park, Church, Hotel, Local Farm, Therapist (I second that!) or Sports Bar—not to be confused with Bra. Our favorite suggestion: Best Act of Kindness—one reader noted Café Gratitude and the free meals it offered to the Santa Cruz Police Department in the aftermath of recent crimes. Perhaps some of these can be woven into next year’s ballot, so stay tuned. In the meantime, enjoy the following pages and take note of our Critics’ Picks, too, beginning on page 91. A big thanks for voting—and for reading—and an even bigger congratulations to all of the winners. Enjoy.  -Greg Archer, EditorBest of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll INDEX

 

Muns Vineyard Rosé of Pinot Noir

This vivacious cherry-pink Rosé is a simply beautiful summer wine.