Santa Cruz Good Times

Saturday
Jul 04th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

It’s About Justice For All, Not Marriage For Some

Col rev.Deb

 

Marriage equality was merely the context of the recent marriage equality cases before the US Supreme Court. Neither case addressed the fundamental right of same-sex couples to marry. The content of both cases was discrimination, challenging laws that treated citizens unequally. Since the legacy of both rulings is not issue specific, there is huge impact towards a more just society for all.

The recent refusal of The Supreme Court to rule on the Proposition 8 case left standing the decision under appeal of the 9th Circuit Federal Court. In an absolutely brilliant and comprehensive analysis, Judge Vaughn Walker overturned Prop 8 declaring it to be unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Established right after slavery, it insures equal protection under the law by prohibiting states from enacting laws, through legislation or the ballot, that infringe upon the rights of its citizens. Prop 8, the largest initiative in U.S. history, had an unprecedented amount of support on both sides. Amicus (Friends of the Court) briefs, submitted on behalf of overturning Prop 8 spanned an extremely wide array of supporters including the U.S. Justice Department, Mexican-American Legal Defense Fund (MALDEF), and the California Coalition of Churches. The support was partially about marriage equality, but primarily motivated by the dangerous threat Prop 8 was to minority rights.

The 4tharticle of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), defines marriage as being between a man and a woman. Under this provision, the Federal Government has been denying approximately 1,100 federal benefits to legally married same-sex couples that it has been granting opposite-sex couples. The surviving spouse benefits include social security and exemption from inheritance taxes. The federal case, Windsor vs U.S., ruled this violated the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, prohibiting the Federal Government from denying rights without due process. Not yet tried is the aspect of DOMA that allows states to not honor same-sex marriages of other states. Hence, a couple legally married in their home state would not be related once they cross the border to a state that does not recognize their marriage.

Once again, in both marriage equality cases, the freedom to marry was merely the context. The real content was about freedom from discrimination. What has been on trial in these cases is justice, not marriage equality which is a battle still to be fought. The rulings do, however, reinforce protections for all US citizens from unfair treatment. Essentially, what was on trial in the Prop 8 case, Hollingsworth vs Perry, was the intent of the initiative. Prop 8 was not just any law; it was an amendment to California’s constitution that carved out the pre-existing rights of some of its citizens. Was Prop 8 really about removing any legal ambiguities about marriage by clearly defining it as being between a man and a woman, or was it about rescinding the right of same-sex couples to marry?

California is unique in this regard. In May 2008, the California Supreme Court ruled that the freedom of same-sex couples to marry was a pre-existing right under the state’s constitution that had been unduly denied them. The state’s constitution guarantees equal protection under the law and non-discrimination based upon sex. Some applicants were denied marriage licenses solely because of their sex. During the entire Prop 8 campaign same-sex marriages were already taking place. Hollingsworth vs Perry was not about the freedom to marry being granted, but the freedom to marry being taken away.

The ruling against Prop 8 determined that the Prop 8 campaign deliberately attempted to marginalize same-sex couples. Its defeat protects vulnerable citizens from the transitory winds of public opinion and reaffirms that no populace has the power to vote away constitutional rights. For the safety of democracy, it needed to be overturned. Legally, its defeat is not so much about marriage as it is protecting the rights of the minority against the majority. If the Prop 8 precedent remained anything could happen, such as the public voting to not publicly educate children born on US soil if their parents are non-documented, or to ban non-Christians from holding high governmental positions. I know that Prop 8 proponents are frustrated feeling like their vote doesn’t matter. They fail to understand that they didn’t have the right to take away someone else’s rights. Furthermore, Prop 8 opponents think it is all about marriage and are failing to see their efforts as championing justice for all.  Let’s proclaim we are One, not we won.

Rev Deborah L. Johnson, a lifetime social justice activist, is founding minister of Inner Light Ministries in Soquel, CA.  www.innerlightministries.com

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

The Boards Are Back in Town

More than a century after a famed trio of Hawaiian princes first surfed in Santa Cruz, their redwood olo surfboards are returning to the Museum of Art & History

 

We Hold These Truths to Be Self-Evident

Saturday, July 4, is the 239th birthday of the United States, commemorating the signing of the Declaration of Independence (the U.S. astrology chart has Aquarius moon—freedom for its people, by its people). Cancer, a liberating and initiating sign, is the “gate” where Spirit enters matter. Cancer receives and distributes Ray 3 (Divine Intelligence) and Ray 7 (new rules, new rhythms, new free nation under God). Cancer represents an intelligent freethinking humanity that can and must create right economics for the world. This means a policy of sharing, an opportunity for the U.S. when Venus (money, resources, possessions, etc.) retrogrades July and August in Leo (the heart of the matter). The United States has a unique spiritual task for the world: to lead humanity within and toward the light, accomplished by its people who must first awaken to this task, learn discrimination and be directed by the soul to assume the Herculean task of spiritual world leadership. Let us review the first words of our Constitution: “We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America.” Let us form that union together. The following is a review of the spiritual tasks for each sign. Read all the signs. They all apply to everyone.  

 

The New Tech Nexus

Community leaders in science and technology unite to form web-based networking program

 

Film, Times & Events: Week of July 3

Santa Cruz area movie theaters >
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Lunch is Packed

Picnic basket lunches from Your Place, plus smoked chili peppers, and new owners at Camellia Tea House

 

What would you like the Supreme Court to rule on next?

Raising the minimum wage so that those that are in poverty now can have a higher standard of life. Greanna Smith, Soquel, Nanny

 

Bruzzone Family Vineyards

Bruzzone Family Vineyards is a small operation run by Berna and John Bruzzone. Starting out a few years ago making only Chardonnay, they eventually planted Pinot Noir on their extensive property and now make this varietal as well.

 

Ty’s Eatery

Pop-up hooks up with Santa Cruz Food Lounge for healthy comfort food