Santa Cruz Good Times

Wednesday
Oct 01st
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Saving Our Outside Lands

news_ForestLand Trust of Santa Cruz County goes forward with 20-year conservation plan

Stephen Slade can remember a time just three decades ago when Campbell was a tiny rural community, reachable only by rough dirt roads. Terry Corwin grew up in Southern California, surrounded by orange groves that have almost entirely vanished.

“Most people that are growing up in California,” Slade says, “will have a memory of a landscape that is going to be completely altered. I grew up in Modesto and when I go back there now it’s like, ‘Where am I?’ The Central Valley is rapidly changing.”

Corwin offers another example: “Santa Clara Valley, just one generation ago, used to be called ‘the valley of the heart’s delight’ because it was all orchards, and they blossomed in the spring. Now, that’s become Silicon Valley. It’s a great economic engine, but it does make us realize that what we have can be lost in a generation.”

Corwin and Slade are more acutely aware than most of just how rapidly the California landscape is changing due to human intervention. Corwin is the Executive Director of the Land Trust of Santa Cruz County, and Slade the Deputy Director; the nonprofit has been working on environmental preservation issues since 1978.

“What we care about is protecting the spectacular beauty and the working lands and the natural resources of Santa Cruz County,” Corwin explains. “That’s the overarching goal. The problem becomes how best to do that.” The Land Trust sometimes establishes protection for a piece of land by buying it outright and acting as its stewards, as they’ve done with Byrne Forest, the Watsonville Sloughs, Antonelli Pond, the Davenport Bluffs, and other, smaller properties. But more commonly they establish conservation easements with landowners in which the land stays in private hands, and the landowner makes a commitment to keep it in productive use while permanently protecting it from further development.

The Land Trust is currently at the helm of two new and related initiatives, both aimed at preserving Santa Cruz’s natural resources for future generations. The first is Senate Bill 211, authored by State Sen. Joe Simitian and co-authored by Assembly members Bill Monning and Anna Caballero. The bill would allow Santa Cruz County residents to vote on the establishment of an Open Space district within the county lines. Put simply, the term is a legal distinction; if approved, the measure would provide funding and resources for certain parts of the county to be designated as Open Space, and thus protected from development and reserved for certain designated uses, like agriculture or recreation.

More importantly for the Land Trust, it would allow them to apply for federal, state, and foundation grants related to conservation efforts, money that they say is sorely needed. Senator Simitian agrees. “Anyone who takes a moment to look around Santa Cruz County would say that it’s really an extraordinary place,” he says. “The notion here is that an Open Space district would allow local voters to preserve that sense of place that is unique to the county … Done right, an Open Space district can strengthen the protections for working lands, including agricultural and forest lands. The Land Trust is concerned about protecting both.”

But crafting the wording of the proposed measure has been tricky. Both the City of Watsonville and conservation groups from outside the county have already voiced concerns about the bill. Watsonville wanted to be sure there was representation from the city or from South County, then the other California conservation groups expressed worry that the changes made to the bill to meet Watsonville’s needs would establish precedents that would not be in the best interests of their own constituencies. These difficulties slowed the passage of the bill, meaning it won’t be available for voters to decide on until 2012 at the earliest.

Still, Assemblymember Monning is confident that everyone’s needs can be met, and that the most serious initial oppositions have been smoothed over. “They raised very legitimate concerns. By working through it, we can actually fortify the integrity of the project. Now is exactly the time to be addressing these questions.”

The Open Space initiative is one piece of the Land Trust’s larger project, the 20-year Conservation Blueprint, which seeks to identify the most vulnerable areas in the county and work out the best way to protect them long-term, even if they’re not currently under threat of being developed. “There’s a tendency for people to sometimes think that what’s not developed is protected,” Corwin says. ”That is, until something starts to happen there, then it’s, ‘Oh my gosh, how could that happen?’ Two-thirds of Santa Cruz County has no permanent protection.”

She adds that the Land Trust’s overall 20-year vision is simply meant to “hold the line,” so that the grandchildren of current generations can enjoy the same homeland sights. To do so, she says there are several things that require changes. “We’d like to see an improvement [on] issues like the wetlands and water quality and water supply,” she says. “We’d also like to see an improvement in the stewardship of lands that are already protected. That’s not to say that we’re anti-growth. Growth is a reality. But as a community, we really should protect the most important resources that we have, and direct our growth away from that.”

Both Corwin and Slade agree that now is a challenging time to be talking with the public about conservation issues. “When we started this, we weren’t in this recession,” Slade says. “Talking about the next generation when people have pressing, urgent needs is very difficult.”

But Corwin points out that it is imperative to look ahead even when present times are tough. “We’re taking a long-term view here,” she says. “If it takes two years, four years, six years, eight years, 10 years, whatever, it’s a vision that we want to get right. We want to be patient and ultimately be successful.”

Slade feels that, overall, each generation is more receptive to hearing a conservation-oriented message, as environmentalism becomes more and more widely understood. “1978 was early in the modern environmental movement,” he says. “It’s just more mainstream now, the notion of protecting the environment. People understand that clean water, for example, doesn’t just happen by magic. It does make what we’re doing easier in that sense.”

People here, Corwin says, value the unique nature of the county, and are both passionate and proactive about protecting it as does the activism-centered ethos of Santa Cruz as a whole. As she puts it, “The Santa Cruz County community is incredibly engaged. We feel entitled and want to be at the table in making these types of decisions. We appreciate that more than ever, and we look forward to making this work for the community at large.”

Comments (1)Add Comment
Stop Ag Well Pumping/Berry Production on Slough Lands
written by Monterey Bay Conservancy, October 22, 2009
Posted: 01/04/2009 01:30:22 AM PST-Santa Cruz Sentinel

Congratulations to Santa Cruz County Land Trust on the Watsonville wetlands deal ... 486 acres bought for you with public/eco funds to save Watsonville's wetlands. One major problem, though, are your plans to continue growing berries and pumping ag wells on this land.

To best protect our wetlands and address our massive yearly water overdraft, the Pajaro Basin Management Plan BMP requires a different plan. This property is located in the most critical area where, according to the BMP since 1993, all ag well pumping must be ceased to stop further saltwater intrusion and no other water is available to continue responsible and sustainable production. None of our elected officials, UC academics, or any other environmental leaders/organizations from Gary Patton on down are aware of this.

The saltwater intrusion caused by continued pumping here has been for decades, and still is, catastrophic to our regional groundwater. In any event, land contiguous or proximate to our invaluable and dwindling wetlands should not be cultivated at all. It can only harm these hyper-sensitive and rare habitats. Renting and farming this land for funding to "restore wetlands" and this nonprofits' executives' and employees' salaries? is a curious contradiction and amounts to very poor vision and stewardship for this property and our community.

I have been trying to relate this general message to Terry Corwin and the Land Trust Board for well over the last two years, with no response from them. Yet I'm still hoping! I've unsuccessfully been trying to convey this same message from the BMP to you, my neighbors and my community for the last 15 years, one quarter of my life, as well.

This land growing berries yearly might cost us almost as much water as two of our new now and counting $100 million desal plants before O&M can produce in a year operating 24/7... and we are in a drought and still as of yet 10-year undeclared countywide water emergency.

Most importantly, the major part of our and Pajaro's BMP regional water solution equation here requires no ag well pumping on these lands and an additional 7,000 acres minimally. I would strongly recommend that any nonprofit or state grant funding must be contingent on fallowing this land and complete and permanent cessation of all further ag well pumping to best conserve our water supply and wetlands. This can be a very significant start to our water solution.

After all, when our water supply and environment is finally completely played out by our local Berry/Water Ponzi Scheme that's running here, we won't be able to print up any more.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

On the Waterfront

As the wharf celebrates its centennial, a personal reflection on its essential place in Santa Cruz’s history

 

Rosh Hashanah

Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, occurs this year during Libra, the sign of creating right relations with all aspects life and with earth’s kingdoms. We contemplate (the Libra meditation) forgiveness, which means, “to give for another.” Forgiveness is not pardon. It’s a sacrifice (fire in the heart, giving from the heart). Forgiveness is giving up for the good of the other. This is the law of evolution (the path of return).

 

The New Tech Nexus

Community leaders in science and technology unite to form web-based networking program

 

Film, Times & Events: Week of September 26

Santa Cruz area movie theaters >
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Melinda’s

New Capitola bakery takes gluten-free goods to the next level

 

Do you think you are addicted to technology?

Santa Cruz  |  Unemployed

 

Best of Santa Cruz County

The 2013 Santa Cruz County Readers' Poll and Critics’ Picks It’s our biggest issue of the year, and in it, your votes—more than 6,500 of them—determined the winners of The Best of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll. New to the long list of local restaurants, shops and other notables that captured your interest: Best Beer Selection, Best Locally Owned Business, Best Customer Service and Best Marijuana Dispensary. In the meantime, many readers were ever so chatty online about potential new categories. Some of the suggestions that stood out: Best Teen Program and Best Web Design/Designer. But what about: Dog Park, Church, Hotel, Local Farm, Therapist (I second that!) or Sports Bar—not to be confused with Bra. Our favorite suggestion: Best Act of Kindness—one reader noted Café Gratitude and the free meals it offered to the Santa Cruz Police Department in the aftermath of recent crimes. Perhaps some of these can be woven into next year’s ballot, so stay tuned. In the meantime, enjoy the following pages and take note of our Critics’ Picks, too, beginning on page 91. A big thanks for voting—and for reading—and an even bigger congratulations to all of the winners. Enjoy.  -Greg Archer, EditorBest of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll INDEX

 

Apricot Wine for Dessert

Thomas Kruse Winery, a participant in the new Santa Clara Wine Trail, has been around for a long time—since 1971, to be exact. When our little group arrived to try some wine at the Kruses’ low-key tasting room, Thomas Kruse and his wife Karen were there to greet us. Theirs is a small operation, and they’re proud to offer quality wine at affordable prices. “Because we are small and low-tech, it’s easy to relate to the whole winemaking process,” says Karen—and the Kruses take pride in making wine “just like it has been made for centuries.”