Santa Cruz Good Times

Tuesday
Jul 22nd
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Gulch Goes Forward

arana gulchCoastal Commission approves Arana Gulch plan, opponents fight on

The 10 to one vote of “approval with conditions” by the California Coastal Commission at their Dec. 8 meeting given to the City of Santa Cruz for the newest version of their Arana Gulch Master Plan was seen as a victory for supporters. It was the commission's third review of the plan in two years. With slight changes each time, the basic idea is still to pave selected trails and build two bridges over portions of the 68-acre greenbelt between the Eastside of Santa Cruz and Live Oak north of the Upper Harbor.

City Parks and Recreation Director Dannettee Shoemaker says the project will provide access to the gulch for people with disabilities and children in strollers, as well as for others for whom walking the existing trails is difficult.

A Seabright resident in a wheelchair brought Shoemaker’s point home at the Dec. 8 meeting, telling the crowd that his enjoyment of the space has, thus far, only been possible through photographs. The one public access point at the top of the meadow on Agnes Street is not wide enough to get a wheelchair through. The other, at the bottom behind the Santa Cruz Upper Harbor, is wide enough, but it leads to trails that are a challenge to any set of wheels in their current state.

“We are excited about opening it up to everyone while enhancing protections to the environment,” Shoemaker said.

The latest plan includes using permeable pavement of a light tone to lay about a half mile of paths in the northern parts of the gulch. Given that these sections are heavily used, the bridges will have benches to observe the habitat without interference and the permeable pavement will allow the ground to soak up water rather than cause further erosion, which is one issue the city aims to address through the Master Plan.

The commission and city officials are hopeful that fences and signs will limit traffic to these few trails in order to allow a tarplant comeback. The plant is known to grow only in Santa Cruz and Monterey counties, although a few are found in other parts of Northern California.

The plant maintains its largest numbers in the area west of the Upper Harbor where there is no public access point. More than 100,000 were counted in this section of the gulch in 1986, but the population has since declined steeply, according to the Coastal Commission staff report read on Dec. 8 by Coastal Planner Susan Craig of the commission's Santa Cruz office. This is currently the least used part of the gulch. Craig says no tarplants have been found between the Upper Harbor Dry Boat Yard and Agnes Street, where more heavily trafficked trails are, since 2004.

Friends of Arana Gulch co-founder Jean Brocklebank says that signs marking authorized trails will have little effect on people intent on trekking to more distant parts of the gulch.

“People go where they want to go,” she says, “and pavement is a magnet to skateboarders [and] motorcycles, and brings these and other unintended consequences. They can work on all the problems of the endangered species and accessibility without the paved paths.”

The changes in paving materials and emphasis on educational tours by the Santa Cruz Museum Of Natural History found in the most recent plan don't change what Brocklebank believes to be the overarching motives. She believes the bridges are an outdated solution to connect the Eastside with Live Oak from more than a decade ago, when there were no bike lanes on much of Soquel Avenue.

“Of the 78-page Master Plan, if you draw a line through the Broadway-Brommer bike path parts, you have about four pages of text,” she says.

Most of the conservation efforts will be focused on the 14 acres of the gulch that are used least by people currently and still have the strongest population of tarplants. City staff and the Coastal Commission also feel that a key piece of the plan is to bring back the grazing of cattle.

“The decline of the tarplant coincides with the end of cattle grazing in the 1980s,” says Craig. “This continued decline shows that grazing may be essential to the vitality of the tarplant in Arana Gulch.”

Friends Of Arana Gulch say recent momentum of the newest Master Plan will not stop their fight against any tinkering with the habitat that they say will do more harm than good.

The city council approved the plan—now estimated to cost $5 million to complete—in November on the condition that the Coastal Commission gave the go ahead.

Although the coastal commission gave it a 10-one approval, the vote did have some strings attached. The city must now clarify how they plan to gauge progress of the tarplant's revival. They must also recruit members of the California Native Plant Society and other biologists to oversee management of the process.

The city has committed an estimated $500,000 to fund this staff, which they plan to raise by selling or leasing excess city properties. Shoemaker is optimistic they will meet these standards.

“Most modifications [to the plan] had to do with whether we were going to count the increase in numbers of plants or percentages—basically the tools of measuring the success,” says Shoemaker.

While city officials are optimistic that they have made a leap toward starting construction, Brocklebank says it “will take years” to meet the list of conditions set by the commission.

“Building two bridges over Arana Gulch was a bad idea 15 years ago and it’s a bad idea now,” she says.

Photo: Keana Parker

Comments (2)Add Comment
...
written by Jean Brocklebank, December 29, 2011
Sensing his lack of knowledge of the controversy surrounding Arana Gulch, when I spoke by phone to the author of this article I offered to take him for a walk in the greenbelt so he could understand the subject of his writing. How unfortunate he chose to write about a place he has never seen. He also obviously based his article solely on interviews, without any fact-checking or review of the extensive history of the controversy. The result is a jumble of unconnected statements and his article gets just about everything wrong, including misstating me several times (a risk when speaking with many - not all - media individuals).

Fortunately, even with the confusion of this inarticulate article, the first comment by a reader is spot on. Friends of Arana Gulch (FOAG) have been telling both the City and the Coastal Commission, for years, that access and ADA compliant pathways in the greenbelt are not dependent on building a 10' - 12' wide two-way bicycle paved route on "critical "habitat of an endangered species. I made this point clearly and that is why I mentioned that the AG Master Plan of 78 pages length, provides for ADA compliant interpretive trails without building the $5 million (plus) Broadway Brommer (BB) transportation project (easily removed from the MP since it represents only 4 pages of an otherwise excellent resource management document).

As for suggesting that the paved BB route and the second one from Agnes St. to meet BB are somehow not going to harm tarplant habitat, nothing could be further from the truth. The City has been so informed by the CA Dept. of Fish & Game, which oversees the Endangered Species Act for the state listed endangered Holocarpha macradenia. Tarplant restoration will be of its habitat. The City shall have to obey science-based management. A tarplant zoo is not the goal of habitat management. Viability of habitat is the goal.

Lastly, the Conditions of Approval, attached to the Coastal Commission vote, are not "strings attached." They are extremely specific terms that must be met before any permit to develop the BB project is granted.

...
written by Wilde Gurl, December 21, 2011
While I support access, my guess is that more bikes and skateboards will be using those paved paths than wheelchairs.

I love the logic - someone in a wheelchair points out that they could use the current upper trails of Arana Gulch, but they can't get thru the gate. So we spend $5 million to tear out the gate and pave the heck out of the nature area. And add two bridges so it is a thoroughfare and not a nature area.

Uh, yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I'm disappointed the coastal commission did not see the value in keeping this area green. I will miss feeling that I have stepped back in time when I'm walking in Arana Gulch.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

Art Files: Opposites Attract

Using found objects, Victoria May seeks beauty in dichotomy and tension, the creepy and absurd

 

A Year of Creative Self-Expression

Wednesday, after a year in Cancer’s nourishing waters, Jupiter enters fiery Leo. Next Tuesday, the sun joins Jupiter in Leo. Leo is the sign of the three fires of life, of seeking our individuality, our gifts and talents. Life for the next year will be quite dramatic, expressive, creative and generous. Jupiter, the heart of Aquarius, is the planet of expansion and truth, distributing Ray 2 of Love and Wisdom.

 

Final Cut

Cedar Street Video to close after 10 years at downtown location

 

Film, Times & Events: Week of July 18

Santa Cruz area movie theaters >
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Posted

Desserts at Seabright’s La Posta, a pop-up breakfast, local ethnic cuisine, and a long-lost varietal 

 

What is the most outrageous thing you did as a kid?

Santa Cruz | Retired

 

Best of Santa Cruz County

The 2013 Santa Cruz County Readers' Poll and Critics’ Picks It’s our biggest issue of the year, and in it, your votes—more than 6,500 of them—determined the winners of The Best of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll. New to the long list of local restaurants, shops and other notables that captured your interest: Best Beer Selection, Best Locally Owned Business, Best Customer Service and Best Marijuana Dispensary. In the meantime, many readers were ever so chatty online about potential new categories. Some of the suggestions that stood out: Best Teen Program and Best Web Design/Designer. But what about: Dog Park, Church, Hotel, Local Farm, Therapist (I second that!) or Sports Bar—not to be confused with Bra. Our favorite suggestion: Best Act of Kindness—one reader noted Café Gratitude and the free meals it offered to the Santa Cruz Police Department in the aftermath of recent crimes. Perhaps some of these can be woven into next year’s ballot, so stay tuned. In the meantime, enjoy the following pages and take note of our Critics’ Picks, too, beginning on page 91. A big thanks for voting—and for reading—and an even bigger congratulations to all of the winners. Enjoy.  -Greg Archer, EditorBest of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll INDEX

 

Loma Prieta’s Pinotage

Although drinking alone is not half as much fun as drinking with others, after a busy day of dashing around, I came home and poured myself a glass or two of Loma Prieta’s Pinotage 2010 (saving a bit for my husband). There’s something about taking that first sip of a worthy wine that gives one an all-over glow.