Santa Cruz Good Times

Oct 06th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Gulch Goes Forward

arana gulchCoastal Commission approves Arana Gulch plan, opponents fight on

The 10 to one vote of “approval with conditions” by the California Coastal Commission at their Dec. 8 meeting given to the City of Santa Cruz for the newest version of their Arana Gulch Master Plan was seen as a victory for supporters. It was the commission's third review of the plan in two years. With slight changes each time, the basic idea is still to pave selected trails and build two bridges over portions of the 68-acre greenbelt between the Eastside of Santa Cruz and Live Oak north of the Upper Harbor.

City Parks and Recreation Director Dannettee Shoemaker says the project will provide access to the gulch for people with disabilities and children in strollers, as well as for others for whom walking the existing trails is difficult.

A Seabright resident in a wheelchair brought Shoemaker’s point home at the Dec. 8 meeting, telling the crowd that his enjoyment of the space has, thus far, only been possible through photographs. The one public access point at the top of the meadow on Agnes Street is not wide enough to get a wheelchair through. The other, at the bottom behind the Santa Cruz Upper Harbor, is wide enough, but it leads to trails that are a challenge to any set of wheels in their current state.

“We are excited about opening it up to everyone while enhancing protections to the environment,” Shoemaker said.

The latest plan includes using permeable pavement of a light tone to lay about a half mile of paths in the northern parts of the gulch. Given that these sections are heavily used, the bridges will have benches to observe the habitat without interference and the permeable pavement will allow the ground to soak up water rather than cause further erosion, which is one issue the city aims to address through the Master Plan.

The commission and city officials are hopeful that fences and signs will limit traffic to these few trails in order to allow a tarplant comeback. The plant is known to grow only in Santa Cruz and Monterey counties, although a few are found in other parts of Northern California.

The plant maintains its largest numbers in the area west of the Upper Harbor where there is no public access point. More than 100,000 were counted in this section of the gulch in 1986, but the population has since declined steeply, according to the Coastal Commission staff report read on Dec. 8 by Coastal Planner Susan Craig of the commission's Santa Cruz office. This is currently the least used part of the gulch. Craig says no tarplants have been found between the Upper Harbor Dry Boat Yard and Agnes Street, where more heavily trafficked trails are, since 2004.

Friends of Arana Gulch co-founder Jean Brocklebank says that signs marking authorized trails will have little effect on people intent on trekking to more distant parts of the gulch.

“People go where they want to go,” she says, “and pavement is a magnet to skateboarders [and] motorcycles, and brings these and other unintended consequences. They can work on all the problems of the endangered species and accessibility without the paved paths.”

The changes in paving materials and emphasis on educational tours by the Santa Cruz Museum Of Natural History found in the most recent plan don't change what Brocklebank believes to be the overarching motives. She believes the bridges are an outdated solution to connect the Eastside with Live Oak from more than a decade ago, when there were no bike lanes on much of Soquel Avenue.

“Of the 78-page Master Plan, if you draw a line through the Broadway-Brommer bike path parts, you have about four pages of text,” she says.

Most of the conservation efforts will be focused on the 14 acres of the gulch that are used least by people currently and still have the strongest population of tarplants. City staff and the Coastal Commission also feel that a key piece of the plan is to bring back the grazing of cattle.

“The decline of the tarplant coincides with the end of cattle grazing in the 1980s,” says Craig. “This continued decline shows that grazing may be essential to the vitality of the tarplant in Arana Gulch.”

Friends Of Arana Gulch say recent momentum of the newest Master Plan will not stop their fight against any tinkering with the habitat that they say will do more harm than good.

The city council approved the plan—now estimated to cost $5 million to complete—in November on the condition that the Coastal Commission gave the go ahead.

Although the coastal commission gave it a 10-one approval, the vote did have some strings attached. The city must now clarify how they plan to gauge progress of the tarplant's revival. They must also recruit members of the California Native Plant Society and other biologists to oversee management of the process.

The city has committed an estimated $500,000 to fund this staff, which they plan to raise by selling or leasing excess city properties. Shoemaker is optimistic they will meet these standards.

“Most modifications [to the plan] had to do with whether we were going to count the increase in numbers of plants or percentages—basically the tools of measuring the success,” says Shoemaker.

While city officials are optimistic that they have made a leap toward starting construction, Brocklebank says it “will take years” to meet the list of conditions set by the commission.

“Building two bridges over Arana Gulch was a bad idea 15 years ago and it’s a bad idea now,” she says.

Photo: Keana Parker

Comments (2)Add Comment
written by Jean Brocklebank, December 29, 2011
Sensing his lack of knowledge of the controversy surrounding Arana Gulch, when I spoke by phone to the author of this article I offered to take him for a walk in the greenbelt so he could understand the subject of his writing. How unfortunate he chose to write about a place he has never seen. He also obviously based his article solely on interviews, without any fact-checking or review of the extensive history of the controversy. The result is a jumble of unconnected statements and his article gets just about everything wrong, including misstating me several times (a risk when speaking with many - not all - media individuals).

Fortunately, even with the confusion of this inarticulate article, the first comment by a reader is spot on. Friends of Arana Gulch (FOAG) have been telling both the City and the Coastal Commission, for years, that access and ADA compliant pathways in the greenbelt are not dependent on building a 10' - 12' wide two-way bicycle paved route on "critical "habitat of an endangered species. I made this point clearly and that is why I mentioned that the AG Master Plan of 78 pages length, provides for ADA compliant interpretive trails without building the $5 million (plus) Broadway Brommer (BB) transportation project (easily removed from the MP since it represents only 4 pages of an otherwise excellent resource management document).

As for suggesting that the paved BB route and the second one from Agnes St. to meet BB are somehow not going to harm tarplant habitat, nothing could be further from the truth. The City has been so informed by the CA Dept. of Fish & Game, which oversees the Endangered Species Act for the state listed endangered Holocarpha macradenia. Tarplant restoration will be of its habitat. The City shall have to obey science-based management. A tarplant zoo is not the goal of habitat management. Viability of habitat is the goal.

Lastly, the Conditions of Approval, attached to the Coastal Commission vote, are not "strings attached." They are extremely specific terms that must be met before any permit to develop the BB project is granted.

written by Wilde Gurl, December 21, 2011
While I support access, my guess is that more bikes and skateboards will be using those paved paths than wheelchairs.

I love the logic - someone in a wheelchair points out that they could use the current upper trails of Arana Gulch, but they can't get thru the gate. So we spend $5 million to tear out the gate and pave the heck out of the nature area. And add two bridges so it is a thoroughfare and not a nature area.

Uh, yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I'm disappointed the coastal commission did not see the value in keeping this area green. I will miss feeling that I have stepped back in time when I'm walking in Arana Gulch.

Write comment
smaller | bigger


Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share


Making a Scene

As it celebrates its 30th year, Santa Cruz County’s Open Studios is one of the most successful in the country—and a make-or-break event for many local artists


The New Tech Nexus

Community leaders in science and technology unite to form web-based networking program


At Clothes Range

FashionART’s 10th anniversary show introduces a new generation of designers on the edge


A Ritual & Initiation

The Pope has come and gone, but his loving presence ignited new hope and goodness in many. While he was in NYC, China’s ruler arrived in Washington D.C. East (China) and West (Rome), meeting in the middle, under Libra, balancing sign of Right Relations. The Pope arrived at Fall Equinox. Things initiated at Fall Equinox are birthed at Winter Solstice. The Pope’s presence was a ritual, an initiation rite—like the Dalai Lama’s visits—offering prayers, teachings and blessings. Rituals anchor God’s plan into the world, initiating us to new realities, new rules. The Pope’s presence brings forth the Soul of the United States, its light piercing the veils of materialism. The Pope’s visit changed things. New questions arise, new reasons for living. A new wave of emerging life fills the air. Like a cocoon shifting, wings becoming visible. The winds are different now. Calling us to higher vision, moral values, virtues that reaffirm and offer hope for humanity. A changing of the guard has occurred. Appropriately, this is the week of the Jewish Festival of Sukkoth (’til Oct. 4), when we build temporary homes (little huts in nature), entering into a harvest of prayer and thanksgiving, understanding our fragile and impermanent existences. We are summoned to reflect upon our lives, our humanity, our nature, our spirit and each other. Offering gratitude, becoming a magnet for others. We observe. We see the needs. We love more.
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments


What’s your biggest pet peeve?

When people say they’re “going down” somewhere, and they’re actually traveling north. Julia Ragen, Santa Cruz, Psychologist


Downhill Cellars

An easy-drinking Chardonnay from Downhill Cellars


If whales have a message for humans, what might it be?

“Do not come in the water and join us.” Howard Hall, Santa Cruz, Retired


Wargin Wines

The wine world is buzzing about this Pinot Gris