Santa Cruz Good Times

Feb 14th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Swine on the Mind

news_swineOpinions are split when it comes to the size of the H1N1 pandemic, but most doctors still recommend the vaccine

After ramping up a vaccination campaign larger than any since polio, public health agencies now say swine flu is on its way out. While some doctors question whether swine flu was ever truly as widespread as it was made out to be, warnings that H1N1 could infect half of all Americans and befell 90,000 came from the highest health authorities, the largest media outlets—even the President.

In late November, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that H1N1 cases have appeared in all regions of the country, besides a few isolated areas like Hawaii, and has claimed about 4,000 lives so far. The World Health Organization (WHO) also announced “early signs of a peak” in the U.S., saying it expects infections to continue to decline.

As its best defense against swine flu, a type-A influenza that began in pig herds, the government spent $2 billion buying up the H1N1 vaccine—the safety and efficacy of which some doctors doubt. Health officials from Washington D.C. to Santa Cruz continue to advise the public to get vaccinated, with the first vaccines going to at risk groups like pregnant women and people with chronic illnesses such as lung cancer or AIDS. But the public’s horse sense, or should we say “pig sense,” has led many to avoid vaccination.

As of Nov. 9, 25 people had been hospitalized in Santa Cruz County for “probable or confirmed” H1N1, five of whom ended up in the ICU and one who died. As of Nov. 19, 7,500 vaccinations had been administered by the county’s two public health clinics; 32,240 doses have been received in the entire county.

Fifty-five percent of Americans plan to “just say no” to a swine flu shot, according to a CNN poll. Santa Cruz, however, seems to be a more skeptical county than most when it comes to vaccines. The county has a vaccination rate of around 15 percent according to Beth Landes, an H1N1 spokesperson at the Santa Cruz County Health Services Agency. As of Nov. 9, 25 people had been hospitalized in the county for “probable or confirmed” H1N1, five of whom ended up in the ICU and one who died, Landes says. Seven thousand-five hundred vaccinations were administered by the county’s two public health clinics as of Nov. 19; 32,240 doses have been received in the entire county.

While the U.S. government ordered some 250 million doses of the swine flu vaccine, and many clinics report running out of it, it is unclear whether the size of the problem required such a stockpile. Our government spent a billion dollars on avian flu vaccines, an illness the WHO reports killed just 250 people worldwide, while SARS infected about 8,000 people, killed around 800, and cost the world $80 billion. To some, the disease craze has begun to seem like a farce, a point that was made clear locally on Halloween night, when pig costumed people wearing surgical masks took to the streets of Santa Cruz.

However, those questioning the purported danger of swine flu, or the safety of the H1N1 vaccine, have generally been handed the dunce’s cap. Why? Vaccines are widely understood to be the single greatest lifesavers in medicine—but only if the public is willing to take them. Many MDs believe that administering millions of vaccines against swine flu is a smart precaution, even if, in the end, the disease turns out to be a dud.

“I would rather give the vaccine and be wrong and know I’ve done all I can to protect my patients, than have somebody die and go, ‘Gee, well, I should have vaccinated,’” says Dr. Dawn Motyka, a Family Practice doctor and medical acupuncturist in Santa Cruz. Like many doctors, when Motyka first looked into it, she feared a “nightmare scenario,” a repeat of the Spanish flu. Between 1918 and 1919, the Spanish flu killed between 40 and 100 million people, and may have even played a factor in ending WWI.

Fear of a major flu outbreak like the Spanish flu also fueled vaccination campaigns during the last two flu pandemics, in 1957 and 1968, but neither of these outbreaks became major killers. Now that our third flu pandemic is looking like a blow out, it may become less taboo to ask at what point a disease is serious enough to warrant spending billions of dollars to vaccinate every man, woman, and child; and, what are the risks?

While the mainstream medical community has put its weight behind the swine flu vaccine, seeing it as a sensible precaution with few drawbacks, a minority of doctors has questioned the data surrounding the disease. The first big question concerns how many people have really had swine flu.

The original claims on the pandemic proportions of swine flu came from the WHO. Yet the WHO actually changed the definition of “pandemic” on June 11, shortly before it announced swine flu to be one. Removed from the definition were the requirements that the disease cause many people to fall seriously ill, and cause many to die. In fact, on Nov. 8, the WHO said that worldwide, 6,260 people have died of swine flu.

“There was a lot of potential for a deadly pandemic—it  [swine flu] is very widespread,” says Dr. Lonna Larsh, a holistic family doctor in Santa Cruz. “Technically it is a pandemic, and fortunately it’s not as deadly as it could be. The whole vaccine industry has said so many people are dying, but it is actually less deadly than regular seasonal flu. It’s fear; that’s why all the money is being spent [on vaccines].”

WHO’s determination of a pandemic classification for H1N1 provided the original impetus to launch a vaccination program, but some doctors complained that that status had not been adequately verified.

“I am concerned WHO’s communications is corrupted by the fact [that] they push the buttons in the public’s brains that will raise the most funds,” William Aldis, a retired senior WHO official who worked on the bird flu crisis, was quoted as saying in a Huffington Post article from Sept. 24. “That is incompatible with what the organization should be doing: serving the public with technically correct factual information, pure and simple.”

Questions over the numbers also arose in the U.S. when the CDC changed its reporting rules last July. Prior, doctors had to test patients to see what flu strain they had: H1N1, or another strain. When doctors stopped testing, they began to categorize patients as having swine flu without a test, which resulted in ballooning numbers. While the latest set of numbers released by the CDC show swine flu cases to be declining, on Nov. 11, the Center estimated a staggering 22 million have had H1N1 since April, when the disease emerged, and 3,900 have died. Dr. Motyka says these numbers are “absolute garbage.” If they are accurate, swine flu is actually 20 times less dangerous than seasonal flu strains in a typical year, according to the CDC’s own data. What this data implies is not that the swine flu is safe, but that their figures may be questionable.

While the CDC admits its figure is based on estimates, if the numbers are potentially far off, then why were they broadcast so far and wide? And, why did they call a halt to testing for flu strain? As it turns out, stopping these tests is quite normal once a disease is determined to be widespread. According to the CDC’s website, they called for a halt to so-called “subtyping” of flu strains because any further testing of a proven disease would put an unnecessary resource strain on state health bodies.

Dr. Bela Matyas, California's acting chief of emergency preparedness and response, told CBS news in October that, “With CDC’s fallback position, there are so many uncertainties with who’s being counted, it’s hard to know how much we’re seeing is due to H1N1 flu rather than a mix of influenza diseases generally.”

Some of the most outspoken critics of the official story on swine flu have come from overseas. On Oct. 10, Der Spiegel, a weekly German magazine with a circulation of one million, quoted a number of German health authorities that believe the swine flu threat was warped to sell more vaccines. Wolf-Dieter Ludwig, chairman of the Pharmaceutical Commission of German Physicians, said his group was “unhappy about this vaccination campaign,” and that German “health authorities have been led astray by a campaign by pharmaceutical companies who simply want to make money from an alleged threat.”

In Hungary, doctors are resisting orders to vaccinate the public for swine flu, and in the eastern European country Belarus the president recently accused drug companies of fomenting panic to boost profits. “I know very well what is going on in this super-corrupt, gangster circle of medicine producers,” President Alyaksandr Lukashenka was quoted as saying by Radio Free Europe earlier this month.  “Today, [pharmaceutical companies] squeal like swine; tomorrow, perhaps, they’ll purr like cats or moo like cows,” Lukashenka said.

Santa Cruz’s Dr. Motyka says she doesn’t see a conspiracy involved, but acknowledges that “some capitalists made windfall profit,” because companies that make the swine flu vaccine also make the seasonal vaccine, and profited off both this year.

Another concern is whether the vaccine works and is safe. Under the best of circumstances, vaccines should go through a number of trials over a longer time period to confirm their safety, as side effects like seizures and dementia can take months to manifest. The H1N1 vaccine, on the other hand, went through a fast track testing period—in some areas it was approved in just five days. Additionally, the UK, Canada and the U.S. have promised to shield companies producing the H1N1 vaccines from lawsuits because no insurance company would agree to cover damages caused by the vaccine.

Dr. Drew Maris at the Scotts Valley Medical Clinic says despite the fast track, the vaccine is safe. “The vaccine didn’t go though the length of vaccine testing that something like the chicken pox vaccine or the shingles vaccine went though, but also our yearly flu vaccine doesn’t go through that long of testing,” he says. “The process for making vaccines has been around for over 100 years. It’s tried and true.”

Some doctors have criticized the vaccine for containing formaldehyde, insect repellent, and mercury. In the Der Spiegel article, the president of the German Company for General and Family Medicine Michael Kochen warned pediatricians that, “The risks [of giving the vaccine] outweigh the benefits.” And, the president of the country’s professional pediatric association Wolfram Hartmann accused the German government of issuing “scientifically false statements” about H1N1. He warned that due to the mercury and adjuvant additive in the vaccine, children under three should not be given the shots. “The vaccine has not been tested at all on this group; that is why the risk is simply too great to use it on them,” he told Der Spiegel. While Germany uses the questionable additive adjuvant in its vaccines, US vaccines don’t contain it, although some vaccines do contain small amounts of mercury.

Dr. Larsh thinks the vaccine is safe, but questions its effectiveness. “It hasn’t been out long enough for us to know how it works,” she says.    Regardless of such questions, in the view of many doctors, there is no question whether the vaccine is safe or effective. Dr. Motyka for example, got the swine flu vaccine herself early on, and believes that as a health worker on the frontlines, she needs every form of protection she can get.

“If there was a vaccine for every disease that existed, I’d be right up there in front of the line for every single one of them,” she says, adding that she would give herself “time to process the toxins associated with each vaccine.”

Half-jokingly, she adds, “If I was a librarian on a space station I wouldn’t get any vaccines, but in my situation, why on earth wouldn’t I?”

Comments (2)Add Comment
Swine is on my mind--by Aline G.
written by J. A. Gates, December 05, 2009
This is the most thoughtful article I have read about the outbreak of the H1N1 virus in the U.S. Kyriakou writes for citizens who want to know more than what appears on misleading network sound bites.
When the U.S. government spends $2B for 250M doses of vaccine—enough to vaccinate 82% of the 304M residents in the U.S.--, pharmaceutical companies have a vested interest in vaccination campaigns.
•I would welcome a “Pharmaceutical Commission of American Physicians” that would challenge excessive lobbying of pharmaceutical companies to use new vaccines.
•I do not assume that all vaccines are safe or effective.
•I do not assume that a national vaccination campaign is an automatic first response.
When the World Health Organization declares a pandemic, it creates fear and panic.
•I would prefer that the WHO would offer “technically correct factual information pure and simple.”
When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention release figures about estimated and confirmed cases of a new strain of flu, it needs to state the basis for its statements.
•The CDC lost credibility in its reporting of H1N1 data and assessing the level of public danger.
•Major media sources were irresponsible and fueled unnecessarily the fear of a public health crisis.
Kudos to Good Times Santa Cruz for publishing Kyriakou's article!
Aline G.

swine is on my mind
written by Charley, December 02, 2009
I am a Pharmacist who is licensed to administer vaccines, and have been involved in a number of vaccination clinics. This article represents the type of journalism that the American people should continue to feed off. I would encourage all people who are bombarded by statistics which the "medical media" claims are gospel truth to consider the fact that health agencies redefine their figures again and again. One thing I have learned is that the only statistic you can trust completely is that once you have a disease, you can be 100% sure that you do.

Before lining up for whatever program the government has to offer, people should seek the answers out for themselves. In my opinion, this article has reminded me to keep my mind open, consider the facts, weigh expert opinions, wash my hands, avoid sick people if possible, diet, exercise, and follow up on physician appointments. With great knowledge comes great responsibility.


Write comment
smaller | bigger


Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share


Heart Me Up

In defense of Valentine’s Day


“be(ing) of love (a little) more careful”—e.e. cummings

Wednesday (Feb. 10) is Ash Wednesday, when Lent begins. Friday (Feb. 12) is Lincoln’s 207th birthday. Sunday is Valentine’s Day. On Ash Wednesday, with foreheads marked with a cross of ashes, we hear the words, “From dust thou art and unto dust thou shalt return.” Reminding us that our bodies, made of matter, will remain here on Earth when we are called back. It is our Soul that will take us home again. Lent offers us 40 days and nights of purification in preparation for the Resurrection (Easter) festival (an initiation) and for the Three Spring Festivals (at the time of the full moon)—Aries, Taurus, Gemini. The New Group of World Servers have been preparing since Winter Solstice. The number 40 is significant. The Christ (Pisces World Teacher) was in the desert for 40 days and 40 nights prior to His three-year ministry. The purpose of this desert exile was to prepare his Archangel (light) body to withstand the pressures of the Earth plane (form and matter). We, too, in our intentional purifications and prayers during the 40 days of Lent, prepare ourselves (physical body, emotions, lower mind) to receive and be able to withstand the irradiation of will, love/wisdom and light streaming into the Earth at spring equinox, Easter, and the Three Spiritual Festivals. What is Lent? The Anglo-Saxon word, lencten, comes from an ancient spring festival, agricultural rites marking the transition between winter and summer. The seasons reflect changes in nature (physical world) and humanity responds with social festivals of gratitude and of renewal. There is a purification process, prayerfulness in nature and in humanity in preparation for a great flow of spiritual energies during springtime. Valentine’s Day: Aquarius Sun, Taurus moon. Let us offer gifts of comfort, ease, harmony, beauty and satisfaction. Things chocolate and golden. Venus and Taurus things.


The New Tech Nexus

Community leaders in science and technology unite to form web-based networking program


Film, Times & Events: Week of February 12

Santa Cruz area movie theaters >
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments


Pub Watch

Mega gastro pub-in-progress at the Old Sash Mill, plus the best pasta dish downtown


How do you know love is real?

When you feel the groove in your heart and you’re inspired to dance. Becca Bing, Boulder Creek, Teacher


Temple of Umami

Watsonville’s Miyuki is homestyle cooking, Japanese-style


How would you stop people from littering?

Teach them from the time that they’re small that it’s not an appropriate behavior. Juliet Jones, Santa Cruz, Claims Adjuster