Santa Cruz Good Times

Tuesday
Jul 29th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Rallying for the River

news1New alliance takes aim at making over the San Lorenzo River

Could the San Lorenzo River become a draw to Downtown Santa Cruz, offering opportunities for recreation, picnicking, and more? A quick look at the riverfront in its current condition certainly doesn’t inspire much confidence. In recent years, the San Lorenzo River has become a sore spot in the Santa Cruz community with a reputation for being dirty and crime-ridden. But a coalition of local community and environmental leaders and organizations wants to change that perception and remake the area into a riverfront we can all enjoy and be proud of.

It isn’t going to be an easy task, however.

Santa Cruz Police Department statistics show a high concentration of criminal activity along the river, and many of the recommendations of the 2013 Public Safety Citizen Task Force focus on improving the river way. On a recent Saturday afternoon, a tour of the river saw illegal campsites and garbage throughout the levee, though a handful of bicyclists and bird-watchers were also present.

Additionally, the river is currently on the state’s impaired waters list due to its levels of nutrients, pathogens and sediment, and it doesn’t currently meet federal and state water quality objectives. Despite this, it’s the primary source of water for the City of Santa Cruz and water supply levels remain a continued concern. Although the water quality needs to be improved, some, such as Greg Pepping, executive director of the Coastal Watershed Council, believe concerns may be inflated.

“I think it’s cleaner than people think,” he says.

Pepping and the Coastal Watershed Council are leading the charge to revitalize the river. In the fall, the organization kicked off the campaign to revamp the river with a sold-out San Lorenzo River paddle that brought dozens of people, including then-Mayor Hilary Bryant, out on kayaks and stand-up paddleboards. That event, hailed as a success by the council, helped encourage city councilmembers to look into lifting the prohibition on floating and paddling in the river.

On Tuesday, Jan. 7, the Coastal Watershed Council and Pepping officially announced the formation of the San Lorenzo River Alliance. The coalition will focus on creating a thriving Santa Cruz riverfront, and its members include the City of Santa Cruz, the county, the Museum of Natural History, and dozens of other community and environmental leaders.

“We are shaping the fate of the rivers,” says former mayor Bruce Van Allen. “We need to revitalize the river.”

Van Allen, a longtime Santa Cruz resident and community activist, has earned a reputation as being “the river guy” when it comes to his boosterism for the San Lorenzo River. He imagines the levee becoming an urban park that’s “beautiful from every way you approach it.”

This is hardly a new idea. In 2003, the city council adopted the San Lorenzo Urban River Plan, itself an update to the San Lorenzo River Design Concept Plan of 1987 and the San Lorenzo River Enhancement Plan of 1989. The urban river plan provided a 20-year comprehensive plan for the areas of the river, Branciforte Creek and Jessie Street marsh within city limits. It included recommendations for increasing public access and recreation opportunities, flood control and vegetation restoration, among others. The San Lorenzo River Alliance plans to re-engage with those plans, which—halfway through—have seen little come to fruition.

Supporters, however, feel that can—and should—change.

“I refuse to believe we don’t have the resources to have that here,” says Pepping.

Pepping points to successful waterfront revitalization efforts in cities such as Austin, Texas, Boulder, Colo., and, closer by, Paso Robles. The Salinas River is a central feature of Paso Robles, but access has long been severely limited news1-2As executive director of the Coastal Watershed Council, Greg Pepping is leading the charge to revitalize the San Lorenzo River.due to an assortment of physical barriers and private development. With support from the National Park Service’s Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program, community leaders there have worked tirelessly to improve that city’s riverfront.  The advocacy group founded to work on it has managed to purchase 150 acres of land dedicated to improved public access, restored five acres of river corridor, constructed a 1.5-mile parkway trail and installed bilingual interpretive signs along the trail, according to Paso Robles city officials.

Members of the San Lorenzo River Alliance see such successes as proof that similar efforts can become a reality here, as well.

The 2013 Public Safety Citizen Task Force outlined a number of recommendations for improving the area in its report. Many of those recommendations included increasing and improving lighting, a goal already being undertaken by the city’s Public Works Department. Lighting was upgraded with energy efficient LED lights in the parking lots near the Kaiser Permanente Arena, the San Lorenzo Benchland Park and along the pedestrian bridge over the San Lorenzo River. City staff have also walked with volunteers who clean up the levee regularly to explore the existing conditions there, according to city officials, and have been meeting with property owners in the area to discuss collaborative efforts that could be taken.

Pepping and others within the alliance believe the biggest step will be to get people actually using and enjoying the area. He believes the city council’s unanimous support for exploring lifting the current no-paddling policy is a great step forward.

“Use dissuades disuse,” says Pepping.

The big push to promote the river’s revitalization will include holding more outreach events for the public. This past weekend, local organizations held a series of talks and events focused on the story of the river, both past and present. Randall Brown, a local historian, and Fred McPherson, who organized the 1970s citizen group Save the San Lorenzo, spoke about human impact on the river and citizen action to restore it. The county’s water resources director, John Ricker, also spoke, joined by watershed expert Brock Dolman, the founder of the Occidental-based Watershed Advocacy, Training, Education and Research Institute.

Longtime fisheries biologist Don Alley, who has been taking samples from the rivers for the past three decades, also led a walking tour of the river focused on its steelhead and coho salmon populations. He says he’s seen the fisheries’ quality continually decline and has been disappointed by how comparatively little effort has been made to enhance them.

“You saw a lot of positive stuff at the talks but the bottom line is these fish haven’t shown any improvement since I’ve been studying them,” says Alley, referring to the weekend’s events.

Steelhead is a threatened species while coho is on the endangered species list.

Alley, who led a group of about 30 around the levee on Saturday, Jan. 11, says he is encouraged by this latest effort to improve the river, however, and believes there is now “a group of people who actually seem to care about the fish.”  He wants to see aspects of the federal recovery plan for the fish species incorporated in the river management plan.

He hopes that if residents begin using the riverfront more often, that will help foster a stronger connection to the natural resource and encourage a renewed interest in fishery enhancement.

Regular meetings about the river will resume after a four-year hiatus, and working groups will be formed around topics such as water quality, recreational access and wildlife habitat. Though those meetings haven’t been scheduled yet, Pepping says he hopes to start them in February. The meetings will provide an opportunity for residents to share their ideas, be reminded of the urban river plan and the progress that’s already been made, and encourage more of an invested interest, he says.  


Learn more at coastal-watershed.org.

Comments (6)Add Comment
...
written by Lisa R. Sheridan, January 29, 2014
I applaud the efforts of the community to re-vialize the river. Making it safer along the banks for walkers, bikers, birders and those wanting to enjoy its beauty has been a long sought after goal.

The river is narrow and vegetated along most of the upper sections.It seems to be an oxymoron to say lets make the river improved as a nature area and for safty by putting boats in it. The presence of a kayak doesn't equate to improved safty along the river banks, which is where most of the population will be enjoying the river from.

It would be helpful to see an E.I.R. study to understand the impacts boats would have on the many migratory and nesting birds, fish and other wildlife in this narrow river channel which serves as a refuge.

As for scenic beauty, do we always have to be in the scenery to appreciate it?



...
written by Lisa R. Sheridan, January 29, 2014
Re-vitalizing the river along the river front meets everyones needs. Business benefit, as will as birds and fish. It would benefit those who want to enjoy its beauty for walking, birding and transit by bike. However, boats or kayak on the river benefit only a few. The narrow channel means that Bird habitat will likely be disturbed and the visual and scenic elements will be spoiled once again by human presence. Can't the river vision be created without having to put people in the picture?
...
written by Jean Brocklebank, January 28, 2014
The health of the river depends on the health of its watershed. I am still confused as to the goal of CWC's Pepping. Is the goal to return a river to health, health that will benefit fish, birds and humans? If so, there is a lot that must be done that does not include recreating on the river.

Today I stood over the river, on the Soquel Ave. bridge, and watched bird life on the water. As I have said to Greg Pepping many times: "the river is birds and birds are the river." Fisheries biologist Don Alley will likely add "the river is fish and fish are the river." Same thing!

The birds I watched on the river -- feeding, bathing, resting -- would not have been there if paddle boarders and kayakers and canoeists were occupying the water. The birds would have fled. The beautiful Common merganser, diving and surfacing in the middle of the river would have given way to the human powered water craft. The Snowy egret, walking along the edge of the river, waving its yellow foot above the sediment to scare tiny crustaceans for dinner, would have fled. The American coots, taking their important baths and preening, all occupying the center of the river, would have had to move on.

I enjoy the river. I enjoy the Riverway along the levee. I see how the river had tried to re-create itself with meanders and islands after being channelized for over 50 years. It is doing a superb job, with help from the willow planters. Now all the river needs is us to stop the filth that is deposited into it from those who abuse it. Let's get busy!
Wild v Tame
written by Bob Warren, January 22, 2014
With the Christmas Flood of 1955, a decision was made to place levees along the river so as to protect the downtown properties adjacent to the river. Its difficult to image the lower portion of this river will have much of a connection to the people of this town. Hemmed in, view blocked, with degraded water quality, even the fish are wise enough to turn away. Sorry Santa Cruz.....your ancestors loved the river so much they ended up smothering it. Its fate as a low flow toilet is sealed unless you want to buy hope for hopes sake.
...
written by Catharine Gunderson, January 20, 2014
I second the comment of Greg Pepping, above, and want to see what I could see in the 1970's from my home south of Felton, many 3 foot long (and sometimes longer) Salmon and Steelhead in the river. I think it would be wonderful to see the Salmonid nursery protected at the river estuary (rivermouth) when it disconnects from the bay yearly. The juvenile Salmonids need that adjustment time to go from fresh water (river) to salt water in the bay, and every year I see what appears to be either The City or The Seaside Company (my best guesses) bulldozing it so that it goes out to the bay instead of allowing the juveniles an adjustment period. I wonder how many we lose yearly solely because of that. The talks last weekend at the church, and the river walk with Don Alley were great! This movement of resurrecting the integrity of the river is a very positive movement, and it will do much more to enhance our river and city than the negative actions such as putting all the "man" hours into mowing wild places,policing, etc. Thank you for a great article on this seminal part of our city.
Catharine Gunderson
CWC Executive Director
written by Greg L. Pepping, January 20, 2014
Thanks to the Good Times for sharing with Santa Cruz what this public-private partnership, the San Lorenzo River Alliance, can do. Imagine how different Santa Cruz would look and feel if our riverfront was a draw for residents and tourists, a cool place to hang out, and a driver of economic activity instead of what we have today. Here's to progress that's informed by what the community wants!

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

Mars Enters Scorpio: The Nine Tests

Over the years I’ve mentioned the nine tests of Mars and Scorpio. The tests are given to everyone—unawakened, beginning to awaken, and the awakened. The purpose is to test our strength, courage, ability to adapt, discriminate and have discernment. To see if we are deceived by illusion or are “warriors triumphant, emerging from the battle.”

 

Final Cut

Cedar Street Video to close after 10 years at downtown location

 

Film, Times & Events: Week of July 25

Santa Cruz area movie theaters >

 

The Maestra Returns

Cabrillo Festival’s Marin Alsop is back to ‘rock the boat of tradition’
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Time is Ripe

Local fruit harvests hit markets, Storrs Winery celebrates ‘Best White’, and a salt fix from heaven

 

I remember Santa Cruz when…

Santa Cruz | Librarian

 

Best of Santa Cruz County

The 2013 Santa Cruz County Readers' Poll and Critics’ Picks It’s our biggest issue of the year, and in it, your votes—more than 6,500 of them—determined the winners of The Best of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll. New to the long list of local restaurants, shops and other notables that captured your interest: Best Beer Selection, Best Locally Owned Business, Best Customer Service and Best Marijuana Dispensary. In the meantime, many readers were ever so chatty online about potential new categories. Some of the suggestions that stood out: Best Teen Program and Best Web Design/Designer. But what about: Dog Park, Church, Hotel, Local Farm, Therapist (I second that!) or Sports Bar—not to be confused with Bra. Our favorite suggestion: Best Act of Kindness—one reader noted Café Gratitude and the free meals it offered to the Santa Cruz Police Department in the aftermath of recent crimes. Perhaps some of these can be woven into next year’s ballot, so stay tuned. In the meantime, enjoy the following pages and take note of our Critics’ Picks, too, beginning on page 91. A big thanks for voting—and for reading—and an even bigger congratulations to all of the winners. Enjoy.  -Greg Archer, EditorBest of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll INDEX

 

Hunter Hill Cabernet Sauvignon

Smooth with soft tannins, this velvety crimson Cabernet Sauvignon 2011 is delicious and very drinkable.