Santa Cruz Good Times

Thursday
Jul 31st
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Puff or Pass?

buttOne month down for UCSC’s new smoke- and tobacco-free policy

UC Santa Cruz senior and literature major Thomas VanGilder enjoys a cigarette now and again.

But starting Jan. 1, the school became smoke- and tobacco-free—a change VanGilder believes is out of step with its character.

“I think there’s a hypocrisy in the image that the school is trying to create for itself, like there being the Grateful Dead museum that honors the legacy of Jerry Garcia—who drank and smoked cigarettes until the day day he died—and the ’60s era, and a student movement that began here at UCSC,” VanGilder says. “That was an era that defined pleasure; you had the sexual revolution and the re-imagining of what drugs really are.”

The decision to ban smoking on all UC campuses was issued by UC President Mark Yudof in 2012 and in effect by January 2014 across all 10 campuses, says Saladin Sale, co-chair of the campus Smoke- and Tobacco-Free Policy Implementation Committee.

“The UC, which is widely regarded as a leader in many aspects of education and research, has been a little behind the curve in terms of the smoke- and tobacco-free movement, which has been really big,” he says. “There are over 1,100 universities that are tobacco free already, so we’re kind of catching up with the pack as opposed to breaking ground.”

Sale says that, so far, compliance with the new policy has not been an issue. He says that a few people have had to be warned about the new rule but that citations are not a part of the policy at this time.

“We’re not starting out with enforcement,” he says. “We’re leading with education. Fines and citations down the line will be possible but that’s not the agenda. What we don’t want to do is have smoking police running around looking for violators.

“It’s touchy, because feelings can run high, especially when you’re dealing with addiction,” Sale adds, “but people are sensitive to being respected and not being demonized.”

He adds that UCSC aims to advertise the resources they have available for students who are inclined to quit the habit.

VanGilder says that he has continued to see students smoking cigarettes in plain sight. And some worry that the ban could push smokers into the surrounding woods and meadows. Early last month, an anonymous flier appeared on campus depicting five cute, hand-drawn little animals—a rabbit, a squirrel, a deer, a raccoon and a bird—with tears in their eyes, looking baffled, sitting amongst flowers and a bunch of strewn cigarette butts.

“No Butts,” reads the top of the flier. At the bottom it goes on: “As many of you know, starting Jan. 1, UCSC implemented a campus-wide smoke- and tobacco-free policy. With these new rules in place, there are going to be more butts in between the trees than ever. If you find yourself smoking in the trees or grasslands, please be sure to dispose of your butts in a place where they will not be a threat to our beautiful campus. Littering the forest floors with cigarette butts can cause forest fires and harm our wildlife.”

VanGilder says he himself has walked into the woods to smoke a cigarette but that he is careful. He stubs out the cigarette’s embers, breaks off the butt, puts it in his pocket so he can throw it in the trash later, and then continues on with his day.

“Sure, smoking is bad,” he says. “I get that they’re trying to make students healthier, but it’s still taking away a choice that people can do what they please with their bodies. So that kind of bothers me.”

Comments (3)Add Comment
...
written by the forest, March 17, 2014
Well, we are 3 months into it, and instead of people putting their butts into ashtrays that were here before the smoking police came. Now the butts are in the forest, thanks Yudof (why do we pay that clown so much?). People who whine about second hand smoke have obviously never been to China. There is a true example of not being able to get away from air pollution. Quit your griping.
Edited much?
written by Thomas Leavitt, February 05, 2014
"smoking cigarettes in plain site" should be "smoking cigarettes in plain sight". Site = location, sight = visual perception
retired
written by G Domingos, February 04, 2014
People who smoke in the presence of non-smokers are taking away a choice of the non-smokers,
and that REALLY bothers me. And so does the smoke.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

Picture of Health

Santa Cruz just received a high ranking among California counties. But it may be hiding some of the biggest health dangers facing our area

 

In The Time of Leo: Our Creative Efforts

 

Final Cut

Cedar Street Video to close after 10 years at downtown location

 

Time Capsule

Actors age in real time in audacious, mesmerizing ‘Boyhood’
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Foodie File: Maharaja

Chef Didar Singh on Royal Taj’s reincarnation as Maharaja

 

I remember Santa Cruz when…

Santa Cruz | Librarian

 

Best of Santa Cruz County

The 2013 Santa Cruz County Readers' Poll and Critics’ Picks It’s our biggest issue of the year, and in it, your votes—more than 6,500 of them—determined the winners of The Best of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll. New to the long list of local restaurants, shops and other notables that captured your interest: Best Beer Selection, Best Locally Owned Business, Best Customer Service and Best Marijuana Dispensary. In the meantime, many readers were ever so chatty online about potential new categories. Some of the suggestions that stood out: Best Teen Program and Best Web Design/Designer. But what about: Dog Park, Church, Hotel, Local Farm, Therapist (I second that!) or Sports Bar—not to be confused with Bra. Our favorite suggestion: Best Act of Kindness—one reader noted Café Gratitude and the free meals it offered to the Santa Cruz Police Department in the aftermath of recent crimes. Perhaps some of these can be woven into next year’s ballot, so stay tuned. In the meantime, enjoy the following pages and take note of our Critics’ Picks, too, beginning on page 91. A big thanks for voting—and for reading—and an even bigger congratulations to all of the winners. Enjoy.  -Greg Archer, EditorBest of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll INDEX

 

Muns Vineyard Rosé of Pinot Noir

This vivacious cherry-pink Rosé is a simply beautiful summer wine.