Santa Cruz Good Times

Monday
Sep 22nd
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Occupy Update

news occupyJudge dismisses charges against four of the Santa Cruz 11

“I’m so happy,” declared Grant Wilson at the Santa Cruz County Courthouse the morning of Wednesday, April 25. 

Wilson and three co-defendants had just attended their second day of pre-trial hearings to face charges of trespassing, vandalism and felony conspiracy stemming from the Nov. 30, 2011 occupation of a vacant Downtown Santa Cruz bank. Santa Cruz Superior Court Judge Paul Burdick told a courtroom full of supporters and observers that he was dismissing all charges against Wilson and the three co-defendants, Franklin Alcantara, Edward Rector and Cameron Laurendau. Witnesses inside the courtroom say that Burdick told the prosecution, “you paint with too broad a brush,” and that insufficient evidence had been presented to show that any of the four had intended to “commit trespass by design.”

“It was spectacular,” Wilson said. “The judge said that the assistant DA had not shown any evidence that any of us had committed any vandalism, or that any of us had been there other than [for] a short period of time in daylight hours on Nov. 30, when the building was first occupied.”

Becky Johnson, another one of the 11 people charged by the Santa Cruz District Attorney in this case, was on the scene and observed the dismissal. “Pinch me—this must be a dream,” she told GT just minutes after the charges were dismissed. “I’ve been watching these courtrooms for years and I haven’t seen anything like this. I would call it justice.”

Johnson is scheduled for a preliminary hearing on May 29. “I’m anticipating a motion to dismiss my charges before that date,” she said. “That could happen in light of today’s findings.”

Jamyrson Pittori, the attorney representing co-defendent Rector, says there simply wasn’t a case against the individuals in question. “When my client happened upon the scene on Nov. 30, the doors [of the bank building] were wide open, there were about a hundred people milling about,” Pittori says. “There were two police officers standing on the lawn not saying anything to anybody. There was amplified music coming out of the building. Who wouldn’t be curious? It looked like a lawful community event.”

Assistant District Attorney Rebekah Young said in court that she plans to re-file charges against Alcantara and Laurendau.

“I don’t see why,” Alcantara said after the hearing. “It’s going to waste a whole lot of taxpayers dollars.” He added that he might pursue a counter-lawsuit against the Santa Cruz Police Department and District Attorney. “I feel I’ve been selectively prosecuted because I’ve been out there throughout the whole [Occupy] movement,” he said.

Johnson agrees. “This particular case was scapegoating a bunch of activists,” she says. In an early April interview, ADA Young offered GT a different view. “What the current defendants would like you to think is that they’ve been picked on, they’ve been chosen because they’re community activists,” she said. “Nothing could be further from the truth.”

During the recent pre-trial hearings, the ADA presented a new estimate of damage incurred during the three-day occupation of the building, which is leased by Wells Fargo. Originally pegged to be $30,000, the amount is now said to be $22,000.

“I think Wells Fargo can absorb the $22,000,” said Pittori. “That would be a tax write off for them. But the thousands on top of thousands that we spend prosecuting innocent, curious people? There’s nowhere we can write that off.”

Judge Burdick also deemed testimony from David Gunter, the lead police investigator for the case, not to be credible after Gunter testified during one hearing that he hadn’t been at the occupied building on Dec. 2 and at a later hearing said he had.

For some of the co-defendants, the most unsettling thing about the case was the conspiracy charges.

“According to lawyers, conspiracy can have to do with anything before, during or after a supposed crime,” Wilson said. “If I meet with any of the other 11, it could be considered evidence that we were conspiring and committed a crime. It has a chilling and isolating influence.”

Pittori said that the ADA’s attempt to show conspiracy fell short. “The cases she did cite were murder cases where two co-defendants had active parts,” he said. ”You can’t stretch that to a trespass-vandalism case.”
According to ADA Young, the intent of the individual defendants is not what controls a charge.  “Everyone could come back after the fact and say, ‘I just wanted to give my support,’” she told GT in April. “What the law looks at is the conduct. Did you trespass in that building? That’s the touchstone.”

Outside of the courthouse, Wilson seemed pleased but not ready to celebrate. “I’m in the clearing but there are still woods around,” he said. “There are other people who are innocent, being accused of serious crimes. I encourage people to sign the online ACLU petition to drop all the charges.” As of press time, more than 1,000 people had signed the petition, which is titled “ACLU Statement of Support” and is found online at santacruzeleven.org.

“I hope justice prevails and truth is exposed,” Wilson added soberly.

Comments (7)Add Comment
...
written by John Colby, May 09, 2012
It should concern the community that Santa Cruz DA Rebekah Young would pursue prosecutions with such flimsy evidence. It is disturbing, suggesting that Santa Cruz is not immune to the larger police state apparatus nourished since 9/11 which is being flexed in reaction to the Occupy movement.
...
written by Robert Norse, May 05, 2012
These charges are part of a darkening political sky in Santa Cruz and across the country--an unconstitutional crackdown against the Occupy movement by authorities who would crush what looks to be the most vibrant protest movement in decades.

Good Times: Why not support alternative journalists like Alex, Becky, Bradley, me, and Brent? The prosecution has zero evidence of any vandalism done by any of the 11. Scapegoating whistleblowers is a crime. And so are empty buildings held by profiteering bankster crooks like Wells Fargo..
...
written by Robert Norse, May 05, 2012
At a rousing support rally abd march yesterday, typically sidelined by Sentinel, attorney Ben Rice announced the dismissal and selective prosecution motions for Darocy and Allen are likely to be postponed until Friday May 11th.

On the same day a "Support the 11 on the 11th" will be held at India JoZe Restaurant 3-6 PM Also check out the on-line petition at www.santacruzeleven.org .
...
written by Robert Norse, May 04, 2012
Thanks for this follow-up.

www.santacruzeleven.org is also a good first stop for updates on the case as well as www.indybay.org/santacruz.

Becky Johnson has written a number of hard-hitting articles at http://www.beckyjohnsononewoma...bel/Occupy Santa Cruz
...
written by Robert Norse, May 04, 2012
Though some of the charges were dropped against Alex Darocy and Bradley Stuart Allen at their Preliminary Hearing in March, prosecutor R Young has refiled them. A motion to dismiss these charges and argue that selective prosecution fatally taints this case will be heard 9 AM in Dept. 6 before Judge Burdick on Tuesday May 8th.

Darocy and Allen's trials are scheduled for May 21st, but the judge will be a different one than dismissed the charges against the four defendants as described in the article above.
...
written by Robert Norse, May 04, 2012
Judge Stephen A. Sillman of Monterey County, a visiting judge, will be hearing the trial. He will also be hearing the Preliminary Hearing of the last five of us as well.

Chillingly, Sillman, on even less "evidence" than Young presented in Burdick's court, still found enough to forward "conspiracy to trespass", and two trespass charges to trial. No evidence of a prior agreement, no indication of the elements of the trespass charges present. The same far-fetched claim that the two were "aiding-and-abetting" just by being present.
...
written by Robert Norse, May 04, 2012
Though some of the charges were dropped against Alex Darocy and Bradley Stuart Allen at their Preliminary Hearing in March, prosecutor R Young has refiled them. A motion to dismiss these charges and argue that selective prosecution fatally taints this case will be heard 9 AM in Dept. 6 before Judge Burdick on Tuesday May 8th.

Darocy and Allen's trials are scheduled for May 21st, but the judge will be a different one than dismissed the charges against the four defendants as described in the article above.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

Catwalk on the Wild Side

Meet the artists and designers behind this year’s edition of FashionART, SantaCruz’s most outrageous fashion show

 

The New Tech Nexus

Community leaders in science and technology unite to form web-based networking program

 

Watch List

From Google to the government to data brokers, why your privacy is now a thing of the past

 

The Peace Equation

Sunday is the United Nations’ International Day of Peace, a global peace-building day when nations, leaders, governments, communities and individuals are invited to end conflict, cease hostilities, creat 24 hours of non-violence and promote goodwill. Monday is Autumn equinox as the Sun enters Libra (right relations with all of life). The Soul Year now begins. We work in the dark part of the year (Persephone underground) preparing for the new light of winter solstice. Tuesday to Wednesday is the Virgo new moon festival. We know two things about peace. “The absence of war does not signify peace.” And “Peace is an ongoing process.” In its peace-building emphasis, the UNIDP, through education, attempts to create a “culture of peace, understanding and tolerance”. Esoterically we are reminded of the peace equation: “Intentions for goodwill (and acting upon this intention) create right relations with all earth’s kingdoms which create (the ongoing process of) peace on earth.” At noon on Sunday, in all time zones, millions of participating groups will observe a moment of silence for peace on earth. Bells will ring, candles will be lit, and doves released as the New Group of World Servers recite the Great Invocation (humanity’s mantram of direction). To connect with others around the world see www.cultureofpeace.org    Let us join together with the mother (Virgo). Goodwill to all, let peace prevail on earth. The dove is the symbol for the day.
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Sweet Treats

Local cannabis bakers win award for cookies

 

What fashion trends do you want to see, or not see?

Santa Cruz  |  High School Guidance Counselor

 

Best of Santa Cruz County

The 2013 Santa Cruz County Readers' Poll and Critics’ Picks It’s our biggest issue of the year, and in it, your votes—more than 6,500 of them—determined the winners of The Best of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll. New to the long list of local restaurants, shops and other notables that captured your interest: Best Beer Selection, Best Locally Owned Business, Best Customer Service and Best Marijuana Dispensary. In the meantime, many readers were ever so chatty online about potential new categories. Some of the suggestions that stood out: Best Teen Program and Best Web Design/Designer. But what about: Dog Park, Church, Hotel, Local Farm, Therapist (I second that!) or Sports Bar—not to be confused with Bra. Our favorite suggestion: Best Act of Kindness—one reader noted Café Gratitude and the free meals it offered to the Santa Cruz Police Department in the aftermath of recent crimes. Perhaps some of these can be woven into next year’s ballot, so stay tuned. In the meantime, enjoy the following pages and take note of our Critics’ Picks, too, beginning on page 91. A big thanks for voting—and for reading—and an even bigger congratulations to all of the winners. Enjoy.  -Greg Archer, EditorBest of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll INDEX

 

Santa Clara Wine Trail

My memories of growing up in England include my mother pouring port after Sunday dinner—and sometimes a glass of sherry before dinner. My family didn’t drink much wine back then, but we certainly made up for it with the port and sherry.