Santa Cruz Good Times

Sep 22nd
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

A Conversation with Daniel Sheehan

news1Nationally known civil rights attorney talks politics and progressive litigation

Attorney Daniel Sheehan played a significant role in more landmark 20th century court cases than most people could even name—from Watergate, the Pentagon Papers and the Greensboro Massacre to Three-Mile Island, Iran-Contra, the Karen Silkwood case, and more. The Harvard-trained constitutional lawyer now works on other high-impact cases from his Santa Cruz-based nonprofit the Romero Institute.

“With new technology, we can do what we do from virtually anywhere,” says Sheehan in reference to himself and his wife, Romero Institute co-founder Sara Nelson. “And if you can work from anywhere, why not do it from Santa Cruz?”

Named for an assassinated El Salvadoran archbishop who spoke out against government-sanctioned death squads, the Romero Institute engages in legal consulting, litigation and public education. Cases are chosen carefully; the website states that the institute aims to “honor the spirit of Oscar Romero, looking for cases where injustice is severe and systemic and where people lack the resources to get help elsewhere.”

With two degrees from Harvard, Sheehan has placed an explicit focus on civil rights litigation, and makes a point of tackling cases that, in his view, will have lasting structural impacts upon their resolution.

As one of the co-founders of the nonprofit Christic Institute law center (the spiritual progenitor of the Romero Institute), Sheehan is a strong proponent of “progressive litigation,” and rejects the term “activist litigation.”

“All litigation, if effectively done, is activist,” laughs Sheehan. “Reactionaries are activists. The John Birch Society is activist. The Heritage Foundation is activist.”

“Progressive” is a term to which Sheehan assigns a very specific meaning.

“Progressive, for me, is attempting to isolate out a lot of the ideals elucidated in the constitutional system that we have, and move them in a direction that more fully informs judgments that are made,” Sheehan says. “The intent of the Constitution is to effectuate a natural law worldview. In its original form, it didn’t go as far as it should have, but it was pregnant with those promises.”

Sheehan sees the Constitution as a sort of blueprint that has yet to be fully realized.

“There’s a certain progression in which these things need to logically go,” Sheehan says. “We [the Romero Institute] are attempting to carry out the ideals that are implicit in the Constitution.”

Sheehan recently finished teaching a class and lecture series at UC Santa Cruz titled “Eight Cases that Changed the United States.” Drawing from his extensive background in civil rights litigation, Sheehan offered an insider’s view of the mechanics and dealings of Iran-Contra to students and the interested public. For those born well after the events of 1986, Iran-Contra involved the U.S. sale of arms to an embargoed Iran in order to fund the Nicaraguan Contras—both actions news1-2Daniel Sheehan played major roles in many landmark court cases from the last half century. Now, he’s still hard at work from his Santa Cruz-based nonprofit the Romero Institute. were illegal. Through the Christic Institute, Sheehan and associates were some of the first to file a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act against several individuals who figured prominently in the Iran-Contra scandal. The case failed to secure a judgment, but succeeded in drawing attention toward illicit government activities surrounding the scandal.

Sheehan’s role in many of the other aforementioned cases also ran deep: In the Watergate Burglary case, for instance, he represented James McCord, one of the Watergate burglars who blew the whistle on President Richard Nixon’s involvement (leading to Nixon’s eventual resignation).

“I’ve done all these cases, and people would always ask me ‘How did you ever become involved?’” says Sheehan, who was approached by UCSC Cowell College Provost Faye Crosby about teaching a course on these cases. “The major questions raised by the course were ‘What are the implications for our future?’ and ‘What are the chances of enacting major social change through litigation?’”

Social change through litigation was at the heart of his discussion with GT.

“The overall theme of my work has revealed that there is this element in American society that has existed since the founding of the country that basically does not believe in the basic ethos of constitutional democracy,” says Sheehan. ‘They never did believe in it. They believe in an aristocratic ruling class that gets to make all the decisions.”

It’s not hard to understand Sheehan’s position, considering his history of exposing government cover-ups with regard to Watergate, Iran-Contra and company. But there is one more recent piece of legislation that has Sheehan particularly worried.

“On New Year’s Eve, at 11:55 p.m., [Barack] Obama goes into the Oval Office and signs the National Defense Authorization Act. And only one-one-thousandth of the American people even know that it happened,” sighs Sheehan.

Government covert action is something that Sheehan has studied and worked on exposing for decades, and he says the passage of the NDAA is particularly troubling for him.

“[The NDAA] explicitly authorizes the arrest of any American citizen in the country with no probable cause, no right to a jury trial, no habeas corpus. You can be executed without appeal,” says Sheehan. “How could that possibly have happened? How does that make any sense at all?”

For Sheehan, it all comes back to a certain trend that he’s observed in American politics and legislation. It’s a trend that he’s worked on throughout his extensive case history, and that was reflected in his recent course.

“With the Pentagon Papers case, the entire military industrial complex was lined up to stop the revelation of the content of the papers. It was the same in Iran-Contra,” says Sheehan. “Both political parties, Congress, the Executive branch, almost all of the major news media—none of them wanted it talked about.”

The common theme uniting the cases?

“The thread dragged through all these cases is the unfolding of all these layers, like an onion, to discover that we’re actually living in a national security state,” says Sheehan.

Sheehan sees the current situation regarding national security as stemming directly from the slew of cases he was involved in during the latter half of the 20th century. And he’s not alone in that.

“I tend to agree with Lawrence Walsh, the special prosecutor in the Iran-Contra case,” says Sheehan. “In his final reply, he said ‘Mark my words, the failure of the Constitution and the entire judicial system to address what is at stake in Iran-Contra is going to come back to haunt you. In the future, you’re going to see the assertion of the need to defend against terror, and that will be used to sacrifice fundamental rights all because you weren’t cognizant enough to stop it here.’”

The remarks were prescient, but what are we to do about it now? For Sheehan, litigation and legislation have a special power to effect change past the obvious legal reasons.

“People are trained to engage in the dialectic—there are good guys and bad guys, red team blue team, Lakers versus Thunder, they get engrossed in it as entertainment,” explains Sheehan. “So if you can track people into a courtroom, people get caught up in the energy of that and pay attention. If you can successfully craft the case so that the jury can decide what’s going on, then the viewing audience puts themselves in the position of the jury. And that can be revelatory.”

Currently, the Romero Institute is engaged in a case in South Dakota regarding the abusive foster care conditions faced by thousands of Native American children in the state. The situation, for Sheehan, is just another example of government neglect and corruption.

“It was intentional on the part of the U.S. government to destroy the [Native American tribes] system of self governance,” says Sheehan. ”If you take the 11 poorest counties in the United States, seven of them are on South Dakota reservations. So the government says, ‘we’ll take your land away, but then we’ll take care of you.’ But how are they taking care of them? They have 85 percent unemployment, 80 percent adult onset diabetes, and the highest rates of youth suicide in the country. The life expectancy for a male on a reservation is 42 years old, and for women it’s 46. That’s the condition that [remains] there.”

In Sheehan’s eye, conditions like those demand attention. And if his history is any marker, his attention will bring results.   

Comments (3)Add Comment
Omnifaith Minister
written by Esther Frances, April 09, 2014
I find it alarming that the general populace is not alarmed that a bill has been passed that legally negates the protection of all of us from being extracted from our lives, without just cause, without a trial, and put away where there would be no communication or recourse to our ---until this law was passed--legal rights. Charges can be trumped up against anybody for anything! In a politically charged atmosphere, someone who stands up against factory farming, or to protect the redwoods, or against toxic contaminants in our food, water and air can be considered to be a threat or "terrorist" and carted away. I'd like to see a huge populist swell of awareness, calling out for the revoking of the "National Defense Authorization Act." It certainly doesn't defend our constitutional rights to a trial and creates the fear that to speak out can put oneself at jeopardy, thereby reducing the voice of the people through intimidation.
85-years old and a retired federal "ex-con"
written by Duane R. Olson, November 03, 2013
Without any constructive implications or conclusions of law by me, and supported SOLELY by the statutes within Controlled Substance Act itself, I am able to prove that Tile 21 USC Section(s) 841(b), 841(a), 822(b), and 821, when read in that order, prove that there is no Congressional enacted federal criminal statute that prescribes punishment for "any person" NOT REGISTERED for federal jurisdiction to be federally regulated in the closed commercial system of "controlled substances"! I am not that smart! Am I nuts or what?
written by lighthouse Linda, July 01, 2012
I feel we are very honored to have Daniel Sheehan working in Santa Cruz. And it is very encouraging to read this article that repeats Sheehan's validation of our US of A Constitution.

Write comment
smaller | bigger


Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share


Catwalk on the Wild Side

Meet the artists and designers behind this year’s edition of FashionART, SantaCruz’s most outrageous fashion show


The New Tech Nexus

Community leaders in science and technology unite to form web-based networking program


Watch List

From Google to the government to data brokers, why your privacy is now a thing of the past


The Peace Equation

Sunday is the United Nations’ International Day of Peace, a global peace-building day when nations, leaders, governments, communities and individuals are invited to end conflict, cease hostilities, creat 24 hours of non-violence and promote goodwill. Monday is Autumn equinox as the Sun enters Libra (right relations with all of life). The Soul Year now begins. We work in the dark part of the year (Persephone underground) preparing for the new light of winter solstice. Tuesday to Wednesday is the Virgo new moon festival. We know two things about peace. “The absence of war does not signify peace.” And “Peace is an ongoing process.” In its peace-building emphasis, the UNIDP, through education, attempts to create a “culture of peace, understanding and tolerance”. Esoterically we are reminded of the peace equation: “Intentions for goodwill (and acting upon this intention) create right relations with all earth’s kingdoms which create (the ongoing process of) peace on earth.” At noon on Sunday, in all time zones, millions of participating groups will observe a moment of silence for peace on earth. Bells will ring, candles will be lit, and doves released as the New Group of World Servers recite the Great Invocation (humanity’s mantram of direction). To connect with others around the world see    Let us join together with the mother (Virgo). Goodwill to all, let peace prevail on earth. The dove is the symbol for the day.
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments


Sweet Treats

Local cannabis bakers win award for cookies


What fashion trends do you want to see, or not see?

Santa Cruz  |  High School Guidance Counselor


Best of Santa Cruz County

The 2013 Santa Cruz County Readers' Poll and Critics’ Picks It’s our biggest issue of the year, and in it, your votes—more than 6,500 of them—determined the winners of The Best of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll. New to the long list of local restaurants, shops and other notables that captured your interest: Best Beer Selection, Best Locally Owned Business, Best Customer Service and Best Marijuana Dispensary. In the meantime, many readers were ever so chatty online about potential new categories. Some of the suggestions that stood out: Best Teen Program and Best Web Design/Designer. But what about: Dog Park, Church, Hotel, Local Farm, Therapist (I second that!) or Sports Bar—not to be confused with Bra. Our favorite suggestion: Best Act of Kindness—one reader noted Café Gratitude and the free meals it offered to the Santa Cruz Police Department in the aftermath of recent crimes. Perhaps some of these can be woven into next year’s ballot, so stay tuned. In the meantime, enjoy the following pages and take note of our Critics’ Picks, too, beginning on page 91. A big thanks for voting—and for reading—and an even bigger congratulations to all of the winners. Enjoy.  -Greg Archer, EditorBest of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll INDEX


Santa Clara Wine Trail

My memories of growing up in England include my mother pouring port after Sunday dinner—and sometimes a glass of sherry before dinner. My family didn’t drink much wine back then, but we certainly made up for it with the port and sherry.