Santa Cruz Good Times

Tuesday
Sep 30th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Will Hunters Have to Bite the Bullet?

news1Free flying Condors perch and fly at Pinnacles National Monument, one of three sites—including Big Sur and Hopper Mountain Wildlife Refuge—where they’ve been released in California. Photo by Don Smith.

New findings out of UCSC shed light on lead poisoning among condors

Almost all of the 100 free-flying condors in California have suffered from severe lead poisoning at least once. Treatment is expensive and stressful for the birds, as they must be removed from the wild and sent to zoos and veterinary hospitals. After re-release, many get sick again and find themselves back in captivity.

Now, researchers from UC Santa Cruz have confirmed that lead ammunition is the most plausible source of exposure, and demonstrated that lead causes chronic, long-term effects as well as acute poisonings. The findings were presented at the March 6 – 10 annual Society of Toxicology meeting in Washington D.C., and may help spark conversation about a more stringent lead bullet ban.

Myra Finkelstein and her colleagues from UCSC analyzed 70 blood samples taken from 49 condors. Using a technique called lead isotopic composition analysis, the researchers identified the chemical fingerprint of the lead found in condor blood. They compared this to the lead signatures of 71 different ammunition samples—most collected in the field.

The researchers found that 90 percent of the birds had blood lead signatures within the same range as that of the bullets. The remaining birds had an a-typical exposure source, while a few had not been exposed to lead.

“For over 100 years we have known condors can be poisoned when they eat carcasses shot with lead bullets, although facets of the hunting lobby remain unconvinced,” says Finkelstein. “Our findings help refute some of their claims.”

In a 2009 letter to the California Department of Fish and Game, National Rifle Association’s Susan Recce argued that lead ammunition cannot be linked to high blood lead levels in condors. “There was no proof of that linkage and, therefore, no expectation that banning the use of lead ammunition will reduce health risks to condors,” she wrote.

Others have suggested that trash is a potential source

of lead, and that ammunition shouldn’t be blamed for condor poisonings.

Finkelstein’s new findings paint a different picture. Not only did the lead in condor blood match ammunition samples, it revealed that the contaminant has a larger impact than previously thought.

Even at low levels, Finkelstein found that lead inhibits an important enzyme responsible for making red blood cells called ALAD. Even in condors with relatively low blood lead levels, the enzyme’s activity was inhibited by 60 percent.

“When lead poisoning doesn’t send the birds in for veterinary care, it can still cause chronic, long-term, sub-lethal effects,” she says.

Graham Chisholm, executive director of Audubon California, says these findings should not go ignored. "The findings provide further proof linking lead ammunition to the poisoning of California Condors,” says Chisholm, who was not affiliated with the study. “While condors still face an uphill fight, hunters can make a difference by using non-lead ammunition.”

Banning Lead Bullets

The findings may breathe new life into a poorly enforced lead bullet ban. In 2007, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the Ridley-Tree Condor Preservation Act (AB 821) into law. The bill went into effect July 1, 2008, banning the use of lead bullets within condor territory.

As natural predators like grizzly bears and wolves are driven to near-extinction, hunter-shot carcasses are a major source of food for condors, which must scavenge, as they cannot kill their own prey. Deer and elk sometimes escape hunting parties to die in the forest. This means the animal, and the lead bullets in it, will remain behind.

Gut piles left when an animal is cleaned can also contain microscopic bits of lead. X-rays show that when a lead bullet hits an animal, a snowstorm of lead particles spreads far from the impact site. In 2006, Washington State University researchers found lead fragments in 18 of 20 gut piles tested. Most had between 10 and 200 fragments, although five gut piles exceeded this. In contrast, only six fragments were found in four whole deer killed with copper bullets.

Since the implementation of AB 821 in California, a lack of funding has meant scant enforcement, which, in turn, has led to poor compliance. In Big Sur—one of the state’s three condor release sites—most birds are brought in with blood lead levels 10 times higher than would impair a human.

“It’s not that they are particularly sensitive to lead. Condors are relatively tolerant to it. The problem is that they are constantly exposed,” says Joe Burnett, senior biologist at the Salinas, Calif.-based Ventana Wildlife Society. It only takes one contaminated carcass to poison a flock.

Historically, condors were also poached for museum exhibits and killed by ranchers. The birds once spanned an area from British Columbia to Baja Mexico, and inland to Utah, Idaho and parts of Texas. It was along the Monterey Bay that Spanish explorer Antonio de la Ascension made the first western documentation of condors in 1602 when he spotted the birds feasting on a beached whale. Yet by 1982 there were only 22 condors left in the wild. All were taken into captivity for breeding.

While condors can no longer be found around the Monterey Bay, about 50 birds have been released down the coast in Big Sur since 1997. Together with a sister site in Pinnacles National Monument in San Benito County, and another at the Ventura County-based Hopper Mountain National Wildlife Refuge, 167 condors have been released California. Sixty-one of these have died. Many of the survivors have an ongoing need for treatment due to lead poisoning.

“If we want the condors to have a sustainable free flying population, we need to better regulate the use of lead ammunition,” says Finkelstein.

Until lead is removed from the forests and grasslands where condors feed, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which authorizes reintroductions, will not approve new releases. Even though new birds will be released into existing flocks, no new release stations are likely to be approved, and the population is not likely to expand north of the Golden Gate Bridge and up the coast.

“It’s our policy not to introduce birds into areas where they might come into contact with lead, through ammunition or otherwise,” says Jesse Grantham, condor program coordinator at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. He clarifies there is no formal written document that spells out such a practice, and no official policy on the requirement of lead reduction at potential new release sites.

The Yurok Tribe hopes to begin releasing condors along the North Coast by 2013, near the mouth of the Klamath River in Del Norte County. Yet, due to its avid hunting community, the North Coast is also full of lead ammunition.

This past winter, the Yurok launched “Hunters as Stewards”—a program that encourages reductions in lead ammunition. The tribe is setting up shooting ranges where lead-free bullets can be tested, and organizing an ammunition exchange where lead bullets can be traded for other alternatives.

The Yurok will also buy a portable x-ray machine to use at meat processing facilities where hunters bring their carcasses for preparation. “We will be asking hunters if we can x-ray their carcasses to show how far lead fragments stray from the wound site,” says Chris West, a wildlife biologist for the Yurok Tribe. Humans can also be exposed to lead particles when they eat lead-shot meat.

West hopes the Tribe’s efforts will set a new course for the birds. “Humans are the ones who brought the problem to the condors,” he says. “It’s not like there is a natural extinction going on, and it’s up to us to repair the damage that has been done.”

Comments (2)Add Comment
Gun owners can be a part of the solution
written by Jeff McLoughlin, April 01, 2011
It's important to understand in reading this that their are responsible gun owners who hunt with a conscience about preserving the wild areas they enjoy and then there is the NRA who chooses to deny forty years of scientific evidence. These are two different groups. The argument posed by the NRA and others is that a ban on lead ammunition is a subversive attempt to regulate their gun use out of existence. This is simply not true. The irony is that as obligate scavengers, condors actually benefit from what hunters leave behind IF their ammunition was non-lead. Fragmentation of lead ammunition is the culprit here. It's not hunters, ranchers or anyone else who enjoys the safe and responsible use of guns for hunting and depredation. There is currently a price premium on non-lead ammunition. Market forces will negate this over time as lead-alternative ammunition becomes widely available and competition drives the price down. Right now it's time for gun users to step-up and do the right thing. Be a part of the solution and use non-lead ammunition for the benefit of eagles, condors and all scavengers that play a critical role in wilderness ecosystems.
coordinator, ACTION FOR ANIMALS
written by Eric Mills, March 29, 2011
Was there ever any doubt?

According to the American Bird Conservancy, there are nearly 500 scientific, peer-reviewed studies documenting the dangers to wildlife of lead in the environment. This is a "no brainer," folks. And if hunters are the true conservationists they claim to be, then they should be leading the charge.

We sorely need a national ban on the use of lead for ALL hunting and fishing. We did it for waterfowling 20 years ago, and duck hunting didn't go belly-up, as the paranoid NRA and their cronies predicted.

Now's the time.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

Reflecting Glass

Composer Philip Glass’ first trip to Big Sur was by motorcycle; little did he know that he’d establish a music festival there six decades later.

 

Rosh Hashanah

Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, occurs this year during Libra, the sign of creating right relations with all aspects life and with earth’s kingdoms. We contemplate (the Libra meditation) forgiveness, which means, “to give for another.” Forgiveness is not pardon. It’s a sacrifice (fire in the heart, giving from the heart). Forgiveness is giving up for the good of the other. This is the law of evolution (the path of return).

 

The New Tech Nexus

Community leaders in science and technology unite to form web-based networking program

 

Film, Times & Events: Week of September 26

Santa Cruz area movie theaters >
Sign up for Good Times weekly newsletter
Get the latest news, events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Wurst Case Scenario

Venus Spirits releases agave spirit, Renee Shepherd on planting garlic, Sausagefest 2014, and wine harvest in full swing

 

Do you think you are addicted to technology?

Santa Cruz  |  Unemployed

 

Best of Santa Cruz County

The 2013 Santa Cruz County Readers' Poll and Critics’ Picks It’s our biggest issue of the year, and in it, your votes—more than 6,500 of them—determined the winners of The Best of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll. New to the long list of local restaurants, shops and other notables that captured your interest: Best Beer Selection, Best Locally Owned Business, Best Customer Service and Best Marijuana Dispensary. In the meantime, many readers were ever so chatty online about potential new categories. Some of the suggestions that stood out: Best Teen Program and Best Web Design/Designer. But what about: Dog Park, Church, Hotel, Local Farm, Therapist (I second that!) or Sports Bar—not to be confused with Bra. Our favorite suggestion: Best Act of Kindness—one reader noted Café Gratitude and the free meals it offered to the Santa Cruz Police Department in the aftermath of recent crimes. Perhaps some of these can be woven into next year’s ballot, so stay tuned. In the meantime, enjoy the following pages and take note of our Critics’ Picks, too, beginning on page 91. A big thanks for voting—and for reading—and an even bigger congratulations to all of the winners. Enjoy.  -Greg Archer, EditorBest of Santa Cruz County Readers’ Poll INDEX

 

Apricot Wine for Dessert

Thomas Kruse Winery, a participant in the new Santa Clara Wine Trail, has been around for a long time—since 1971, to be exact. When our little group arrived to try some wine at the Kruses’ low-key tasting room, Thomas Kruse and his wife Karen were there to greet us. Theirs is a small operation, and they’re proud to offer quality wine at affordable prices. “Because we are small and low-tech, it’s easy to relate to the whole winemaking process,” says Karen—and the Kruses take pride in making wine “just like it has been made for centuries.”