Santa Cruz Good Times

Monday
Apr 21st
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Saving The Knoll

news_KBProtestEffort to protect sacred site heats up

Some 50 demonstrators marched on City Hall on Thursday, Aug. 25 to protest the development of an Ohlone sacred site and burial ground in north Santa Cruz, in what was the latest action in a seemingly growing movement to respect indigenous rights.

The site, known commonly as “the knoll,” sits on a 32-unit housing development currently under construction near Market Street and Branciforte Creek. Indigenous and environmental activists alike have opposed plans to develop the knoll since the inception of the idea, but opposition has ramped up in recent weeks after the bones of what is believed to be a Native American child were discovered.

The diverse group of marchers, calling themselves the Save the Knoll campaign, filled the chamber of a closed council meeting that day in an attempt to ensure their voices were heard. Citing the large number of people present, Santa Cruz Mayor Ryan Coonerty permitted a 20-minute public comment period.

Of the approximately 10 people that spoke, many giving teary statements, the common themes were the need to respect the rights and beliefs of indigenous people and to push the city of Santa Cruz to not participate in what they say is the continuation of colonization and pattern of cultural genocide in the United States.

“Santa Cruz has a chance to make history,” Tomas Gomez told the council, “an opportunity to say we will not continue the desecration of indigenous people or our lands.”

Demonstrators also presented a petition with 862 signatures, which Jennifer Charles, a Save the Knoll volunteer, says they collected in less than a week. “That we could collect that many signatures so quickly shows how much this matters to people,” she says.

The city council could not take any action because the issue was not on its agenda. However, the mayor and several council members stated how seriously they were taking the matter and indicated that they would push for a special session the following week to discuss it.

The march on city hall was the most recent action taken by the Save the Knoll campaign. On Aug. 19, several volunteers delivered a letter to the KB Homes president in Pleasanton, Calif. The note demanded KB Homes revise their construction plans and stated that the people of Santa Cruz are “resourceful and creative” and will take any action deemed appropriate to stop the desecration of the 6,000-year old site. Likewise, an Aug. 15 demonstration at the construction site drew 100 people.

For most in the campaign, the development of the site represents the continuation of centuries of colonization and disrespect of indigenous people. The passion to protect the site is made even stronger because the Ohlone Nation, an indigenous tribe that once inhabited the land between San Francisco and Monterey Bay, was largely wiped-out by Spanish, and then European, settlers. It is believed there are no full-blooded Ohlone people left, and their decedents receive no federal recognition and no land rights.  The Save the Knoll campaign is demanding this history be recognized, that the wishes of Ohlone people be respected, and that the city buy the knoll or that KB Homes donates it so that it may be preserved.

While opponents to the development question why the city approved the plan to begin with, their concerns don’t appear to be landing of deaf ears. Vice Mayor Don Lane, who has been working on this matter with planning department staff and KB Homes says they are discussing the idea of KB Homes selling the lot so it can be preserved as open land as well as the possibility of KB Homes forgoing construction on the knoll and building on another, less sensitive area.  However, he says the city is constrained.

“It seems unlikely [we] can come up with the funds to buy the lot.  And, since the land is owned by KB Homes and they have an approved building permit, the city doesn't appear to have any legal authority to require anything more of them,” Lane says.

Additionally, the second option is difficult because the city has already acquired land near the site to protect an endangered plant species and several heritage trees due to an earlier lawsuit by the California Native Plant Society, and thus there don’t appear to be any other locations left that can be built upon.

“We are trying hard to have a productive role in creating a positive outcome that works for the Ohlone people, KB Homes, and for our entire community,” Lane says. “But, it will require flexibility, creativity, good will and generosity to reach that positive outcome.”

Comments (5)Add Comment
...
written by JB, September 09, 2011
I was looking forward to some new housing in Santa Cruz, but knowing hippies here, anywhere will cause disruption... I don't think KB Homes should continue if a) they cannot compromise with protesters and the legality of the situation (they have to investigate any remains found on any site) and b) if protesters are not willing to compromise. It has to be a two sided thing. If they can't come to some kind of agreement, then I know a very nice plot of land over in Aptos that has been vacant for years. I guess I just don't understand why KB Homes wanted to build there in the first place when it had so much potential opposition. There is plenty of available space elsewhere. Maybe the city could trade: KB Homes moves to a different site for a reduced cost or free and the Ohlone site becomes a vacant field that no one goes to again. Its really not that good of a development site in my opinion anyway...
...
written by Sitting Bull, September 03, 2011
This is such bull...sacred ground. The very ground these protestors are walking on, live on, poop on,
if one digs in "their yards" for sure Native American remains will be found. Native Americans densely populated the coast. No no...the Mexicans were not the first here but the first to kill and enslave many of them.
So tonight all protestors when you rest your head on your pillow, most likely ten feet below are "sacred grounds".
...
written by KR, September 01, 2011
If the city is having a hard time coming up with money to buy the land, maybe they should consider cuts to the abominably overfunded police force
...
written by CM, September 01, 2011
I worked as an archaeologist in Tucson and encountered a similar situation - a pre European village, not a burial site. The developer built on most of the site but protected the most sensitive part and built a small interpretive center/museum - working very closely with tribal representatives, archaeologists, historians, and local government. Everyone was was very satisfied and the project was widely recognized and won several awards for culturally sensitive development.
...
written by TM, September 01, 2011
You would never see a christian cemetery in this situation. Santa Cruz City Council and KB Homes have the opportunity to prove they are not RACISTS and value human life. I hope they don't disappoint. The whole world is watching.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Share this on your social networks

Bookmark and Share

Share this

Bookmark and Share

 

Cardinal Grand Cross in the Sky

Following Holy Week (passion, death and burial of the Pisces World Teacher) and Easter Sunday (Resurrection Festival), from April 19 to the 23, the long-awaited and discussed Cardinal Cross of Change appears in the sky, composed of Cardinal signs Aries, Libra, Cancer, and Capricorn, with planets (13-14 degrees) Uranus (in Aries), Jupiter (in Cancer), Mars (in Libra) and Pluto (in Capricorn), an actual geometrical square or cross configuration. Cardinal signs mark the seasons of change, initiating new realities.

 

Sugar: The New Tobacco?

Proposed bill would require warning labels on sugary drinks Will soda and other saccharine libations soon come with a health warning? They will if it’s up to our state senator, Bill Monning (D-Carmel). On Feb. 27, Monning proposed first-of-its-kind legislation that would require a consumer warning label be placed on sugar-sweetened beverages sold in California. SB 1000, also known as the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Safety Warning Act, was proposed to provide vital information to consumers about the harmful effects of consuming sugary drinks, such as sodas, sports drinks, energy drinks, and sweetened teas.

 

Film, Times & Events: Week of April 17

Santa Cruz area movie theaters >

 

Growing Hope

Campos Seguros combats sexual assault in the Watsonville farmworker community Farm work was a way of life for Rocio Camargo, who grew up in Watsonville as the daughter of Mexican immigrants. Her parents met while working the fields 30 years ago, and her father went on to run Fuentes Berry Farms.
Sign up for Tomorrow's Good Times Today
Upcoming arts & events

RSS Feed Burner

 Subscribe in a reader

Latest Comments

 

Foodie File: Red Apple Cafe

Breakfast takes center stage at Gracia Krakauer's Red Apple Cafe Before they moved to Aptos, Gracia and her husband Dan Krakauer would visit friends in Santa Cruz County and eat at the Red Apple Café all the time. Then they moved up here from Santa Monica five years ago, and bought the Aptos location (there’s a separate one in Watsonville) from the family who owned it for two decades.

 

How would you feel about a tech industry boom in Santa Cruz?

I feel like it would ruin the small old-town feeling of Santa Cruz. It wouldn’t be the same Surf City kind of vacation town that it is. Antoinette BennettSanta Cruz | Construction Management

 

Trout Gulch Vineyards

Cinsault 2012—la grande plage diurne The most popular wines on store shelves are those most generally known and available—Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot, which are all superb for sure. But when you come across a more unusual varietal, like Trout Gulch Vineyards’ Cinsault ($18), it opens up a whole new world.

 

Waddell Creek, Al Fresco

Route One Summer Farm Dinner You’ve been buying their insanely fresh produce for years now at farmers’ markets. Right? So now why not become more familiar with the gorgeous Waddell Creek farmlands of Route One Farms?